Turpin High School
2650 Bartels Rd
Cincinnati OH, 45244, Hamilton County
Phone: 513-232-7770
Ranking:
(19 out of 821, top 2%)*

Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Forest Hills Local School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 61 | 63 | 63 | 62 | 62 | 63 | 59 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,174 | 1,164 | 1,134 | 1,132 | 1,146 | 1,153 | 1,120 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 300 | 25.6% | 320 | 27.5% | 317 | 28.0% | 299 | 26.4% | 303 | 26.4% | 312 | 27.1% | 308 | 27.5% |
Grade 10: | 306 | 26.1% | 308 | 26.5% | 284 | 25.0% | 275 | 24.3% | 295 | 25.7% | 302 | 26.2% | 270 | 24.1% |
Grade 11: | 293 | 25.0% | 270 | 23.2% | 264 | 23.3% | 274 | 24.2% | 286 | 25.0% | 278 | 24.1% | 250 | 22.3% |
Grade 12: | 275 | 23.4% | 266 | 22.9% | 269 | 23.7% | 284 | 25.1% | 262 | 22.9% | 261 | 22.6% | 292 | 26.1% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 583 | 49.7% | 583 | 50.1% | 569 | 50.2% | 549 | 48.5% | 532 | 46.4% | 545 | 47.3% | 544 | 48.6% |
Female: | 591 | 50.3% | 581 | 49.9% | 565 | 49.8% | 583 | 51.5% | 587 | 51.2% | 584 | 50.7% | 564 | 50.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% |
Asian: | 25 | 2.1% | 20 | 1.7% | 24 | 2.1% | 22 | 1.9% | 20 | 1.7% | 22 | 1.9% | 14 | 1.3% |
Hispanic: | 24 | 2.0% | 21 | 1.8% | 13 | 1.1% | 15 | 1.3% | 10 | 0.9% | 15 | 1.3% | 9 | 0.8% |
Black: | 12 | 1.0% | 10 | 0.9% | 6 | 0.5% | 7 | 0.6% | 9 | 0.8% | 11 | 1.0% | 12 | 1.1% |
White: | 1,083 | 92.2% | 1,085 | 93.2% | 1,065 | 93.9% | 1,066 | 94.2% | 1,087 | 94.9% | 1,088 | 94.4% | 1,076 | 96.1% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 30 | 2.6% | 28 | 2.4% | 26 | 2.3% | 22 | 1.9% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 76 | 6.5% | 60 | 5.2% | 62 | 5.5% | 77 | 6.8% | 66 | 5.8% | 50 | 4.3% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 31 | 2.6% | 28 | 2.4% | 25 | 2.2% | 15 | 1.3% | 20 | 1.7% | 12 | 1.0% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 19.24 | 18.37 | 18.13 | 18.20 | 18.59 | 18.40 | 19.00 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 89.4% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 94.9% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 97% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 95.1% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 95.7% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 95.2% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 96.2% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 96.8% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 95.9% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 96.5% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 94.1% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 98.7% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.3% | 98.1% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 96.9% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 96.9% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 97.3% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 96.8% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 97.8% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 96.4% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.2% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 92.4% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 92.3% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 92% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 94% | 90.9% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 93.5% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 93% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 93.8% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 94.6% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 93.5% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 92.9% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 95.8% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 93.3% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 93.3% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 95.7% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 96.3% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 96.3% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 95.6% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.1% | 95.8% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 95.3% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.6% | 97.3% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 97.3% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 96.6% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.3% | 98.3% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.4% | 97.8% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 99.6% | 98.7% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 96.4% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 96.1% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.6% | 98.6% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.4% | 98.4% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 98.1% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 98.1% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 98.4% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 97.8% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 98.4% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 99.4% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.6% | 98.7% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 100% | 99.3% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 98.1% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 99.1% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 98.6% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 99.3% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.6% | 97.5% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 97.3% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 96.7% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 97% | 96.9% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.3% | 97.9% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 98.5% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 97.4% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 98.1% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 97.7% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 98.6% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.3% | 97.7% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.6% | 98.4% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 98.3% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 98.3% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 99.4% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.8% | 98.9% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.6% | 99.1% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.7% | 98.6% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.7% | 99.5% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 98.6% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 98.8% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Turpin High School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.