2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 42 | 42 | 46 | 51 | 52 | 56 | 55 | |||||||
Total Students: | 767 | 781 | 794 | 838 | 837 | 825 | 868 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 187 | 24.4% | 186 | 23.8% | 201 | 25.3% | 205 | 24.5% | 209 | 25.0% | 227 | 27.5% | 222 | 25.6% |
Grade 10: | 183 | 23.9% | 196 | 25.1% | 190 | 23.9% | 205 | 24.5% | 227 | 27.1% | 215 | 26.1% | 197 | 22.7% |
Grade 11: | 202 | 26.3% | 200 | 25.6% | 201 | 25.3% | 214 | 25.5% | 218 | 26.0% | 187 | 22.7% | 207 | 23.8% |
Grade 12: | 195 | 25.4% | 199 | 25.5% | 202 | 25.4% | 214 | 25.5% | 183 | 21.9% | 196 | 23.8% | 242 | 27.9% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 424 | 55.3% | 415 | 53.1% | 425 | 53.5% | 458 | 54.7% | 444 | 53.0% | 421 | 51.0% | 434 | 50.0% |
Female: | 343 | 44.7% | 366 | 46.9% | 369 | 46.5% | 380 | 45.3% | 385 | 46.0% | 396 | 48.0% | 430 | 49.5% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 4 | 0.5% | 3 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 6 | 0.8% | 3 | 0.4% | 6 | 0.8% | 5 | 0.6% | 7 | 0.8% | 4 | 0.5% | 8 | 0.9% |
Hispanic: | 50 | 6.5% | 52 | 6.7% | 48 | 6.0% | 53 | 6.3% | 45 | 5.4% | 40 | 4.8% | 41 | 4.7% |
Black: | 7 | 0.9% | 8 | 1.0% | 10 | 1.3% | 10 | 1.2% | 8 | 1.0% | 9 | 1.1% | 2 | 0.2% |
White: | 695 | 90.6% | 708 | 90.7% | 717 | 90.3% | 759 | 90.6% | 774 | 92.5% | 770 | 93.3% | 815 | 93.9% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 7 | 0.9% | 10 | 1.3% | 12 | 1.5% | 7 | 0.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 147 | 19.2% | 154 | 19.7% | 175 | 22.0% | 172 | 20.5% | 151 | 18.0% | 96 | 11.6% | 97 | 11.2% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 69 | 9.0% | 67 | 8.6% | 58 | 7.3% | 87 | 10.4% | 81 | 9.7% | 65 | 7.9% | 54 | 6.2% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 18.19 | 18.73 | 17.24 | 16.57 | 16.25 | 14.80 | 15.80 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
WKCE | ||||||
2004 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 69% | 69% | N/A |
2005 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 70% | N/A |
2006 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 71% | N/A |
2007 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 69% | N/A |
2008 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 69% | 68% | N/A |
2009 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 66% | 66% | N/A |
2010 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | N/A |
2011 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | N/A |
2012 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | N/A |
2013 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 69% | 70% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 74% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 76% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 73% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 39% | 39% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 73% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 76% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 37% | 37% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 73% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 76% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 71% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 75% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 78% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 76% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 75% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 76% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 77% | N/A |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* New London High High School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.