Naaman Forest High School
4843 Naaman Forest Blvd
Garland TX, 75040, Dallas County
Phone: 972-675-3091
Ranking: (905 out of 1,337, bottom 32%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Garland Independent School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 162 | 162 | 163 | 160 | 156 | 161 | 153 | |||||||
Total Students: | 2,194 | 2,425 | 2,454 | 2,402 | 2,445 | 2,530 | 2,359 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 516 | 23.5% | 674 | 27.8% | 675 | 27.5% | 611 | 25.4% | 676 | 27.6% | 764 | 30.2% | 662 | 28.1% |
Grade 10: | 595 | 27.1% | 613 | 25.3% | 588 | 24.0% | 620 | 25.8% | 682 | 27.9% | 628 | 24.8% | 630 | 26.7% |
Grade 11: | 551 | 25.1% | 546 | 22.5% | 575 | 23.4% | 601 | 25.0% | 533 | 21.8% | 544 | 21.5% | 555 | 23.5% |
Grade 12: | 532 | 24.2% | 592 | 24.4% | 616 | 25.1% | 570 | 23.7% | 554 | 22.7% | 594 | 23.5% | 512 | 21.7% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 1,164 | 53.1% | 1,273 | 52.5% | 1,275 | 52.0% | 1,235 | 51.4% | 1,262 | 51.6% | 1,307 | 51.7% | 1,245 | 52.8% |
Female: | 1,030 | 46.9% | 1,152 | 47.5% | 1,179 | 48.0% | 1,167 | 48.6% | 1,175 | 48.1% | 1,215 | 48.0% | 1,110 | 47.1% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 9 | 0.4% | 11 | 0.5% | 12 | 0.5% | 9 | 0.4% | 15 | 0.6% | 13 | 0.5% | 11 | 0.5% |
Asian: | 332 | 15.1% | 356 | 14.7% | 362 | 14.8% | 323 | 13.4% | 341 | 13.9% | 392 | 15.5% | 322 | 13.6% |
Hispanic: | 774 | 35.3% | 856 | 35.3% | 827 | 33.7% | 812 | 33.8% | 777 | 31.8% | 759 | 30.0% | 661 | 28.0% |
Black: | 423 | 19.3% | 446 | 18.4% | 433 | 17.6% | 418 | 17.4% | 506 | 20.7% | 496 | 19.6% | 451 | 19.1% |
White: | 600 | 27.3% | 700 | 28.9% | 754 | 30.7% | 762 | 31.7% | 806 | 33.0% | 870 | 34.4% | 914 | 38.7% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 8 | 0.4% | 5 | 0.2% | 4 | 0.2% | 5 | 0.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 48 | 2.2% | 51 | 2.1% | 62 | 2.5% | 73 | 3.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 853 | 38.9% | 1,003 | 41.4% | 970 | 39.5% | 919 | 38.3% | 875 | 35.8% | 769 | 30.4% | 602 | 25.5% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 168 | 7.7% | 181 | 7.5% | 220 | 9.0% | 160 | 6.7% | 193 | 7.9% | 156 | 6.2% | 166 | 7.0% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 13.53 | 14.96 | 15.02 | 14.98 | 15.66 | 15.80 | 15.40 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
STAAR EOC | ||||||
2012 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 65% | 83% | 83% |
2013 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 60% | 80% | 78% |
2013 | Algebra II | End of course | % met std | 97% | 98% | 97% |
2012 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 89% | 90% | 87% |
2013 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 85% | 90% | 85% |
2013 | Chemistry | End of course | % met std | 79% | 84% | 84% |
2012 | English I Reading | End of course | % met std | 67% | 69% | 68% |
2013 | English I Reading | End of course | % met std | 61% | 67% | 65% |
2012 | English I Writing | End of course | % met std | 56% | 58% | 55% |
2013 | English I Writing | End of course | % met std | 40% | 48% | 48% |
2013 | English II Reading | End of course | % met std | 78% | 81% | 78% |
2013 | English II Writing | End of course | % met std | 44% | 51% | 52% |
2013 | English III Writing | End of course | % met std | 13% | 9% | 42% |
2012 | Geometry | End of course | % met std | 99% | 99% | 98% |
2013 | Geometry | End of course | % met std | 80% | 84% | 86% |
2012 | World Geography | End of course | % met std | 88% | 85% | 81% |
2013 | World Geography | End of course | % met std | 80% | 82% | 75% |
2013 | World History | End of course | % met std | 74% | 77% | 70% |
TAKS | ||||||
2004 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 70% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 60% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 56% | 61% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 60% | 59% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 66% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 69% | 67% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 74% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 81% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 68% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 84% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89% | 85% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 87% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89% | 90% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 67% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 55% | 54% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 58% | 60% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 56% | 57% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 65% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 67% | 69% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 76% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 76% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 92% | 91% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 90% | 86% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 90% | 88% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 94% | 95% | N/A |
2004 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 86% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 87% | 84% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 81% | 77% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 74% | 80% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 77% | 78% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 76% | 83% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 91% | 90% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 91% | 90% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 91% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 88% | 87% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 87% | 91% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 91% | 90% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93% | 94% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 96% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 88% | 85% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 82% | 81% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 76% | 74% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 69% | 76% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 82% | 86% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 91% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 94% | 93% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 97% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 96% | 94% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 97% | 96% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 98% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 98% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 99% | N/A |
2004 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 68% | 62% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 60% | 63% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 57% | 60% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 55% | 62% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 67% | 66% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 69% | 73% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 71% | 73% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 65% | 73% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 87% | 85% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 89% | 88% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 86% | 87% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 84% | 85% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 92% | 93% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 87% | 89% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
Teacher's Experience and Compensation
2007 | |
Teachers with Bachelor Degree: | 68.1% |
Teachers with Master or PhD Degree: | 30.6% |
Mean Number of Years of Teaching: | 12.0 years |
Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | 31.3% |
Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | 68.8% |
Mean Base Salary: | $48,563.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | $44,539.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | $50,393.0 |
* Naaman Forest High School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.