Cardington-Lincoln Local School District
Cardington-Lincoln Local School District is located close to the center of Ohio. Cardington-Lincoln Local School District has 70.95 square miles of land area and 0.01 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Cardington-Lincoln Local School District population is 6,544. Cardington-Lincoln Local School District median household income is $50,000 in 2010-2014. Cardington-Lincoln Local School District median house value is $108,900 in 2010-2014. On average, Cardington-Lincoln Local School District is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Cardington-Lincoln Local School District Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 1,090 | 1,062 | 1,074 | 1,138 | 1,156 | 1,235 | 1,289 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 63.04 | 74.00 | 70.94 | 70.58 | 76.95 | 104.90 | 76.00 |
Prekindergarten: | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | 5.21 | 5.37 | 5.35 | 6.56 | 5.74 | 5.50 | 3.30 |
Elementary: | 23.12 | 28.38 | 28.38 | 29.48 | 33.40 | 34.90 | 31.10 |
Secondary: | 27.31 | 30.25 | 31.55 | 33.71 | 36.70 | 38.60 | 37.90 |
Ungraded: | 5.40 | 10.00 | 5.66 | 0.83 | 1.11 | 25.90 | 3.70 |
Total Other Staff: | 55.76 | 91.94 | 81.66 | 73.00 | 81.25 | 83.90 | 89.20 |
Instructional Aides: | 6.16 | 8.07 | 9.83 | 9.83 | 13.00 | 12.00 | 14.30 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 2.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.30 | 4.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 2.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.30 | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 1.00 | 1.93 | 2.00 | 1.93 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
District Administrators: | 2.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
District Administrative Support: | 4.25 | 4.58 | 4.58 | 4.88 | 5.25 | 5.30 | 4.30 |
School Administrators: | 3.00 | 7.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.30 | 2.30 |
School Administrative Support: | 6.18 | 8.92 | 5.99 | 5.54 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 5.00 |
Student Support Services: | 6.50 | 12.00 | 9.01 | 8.01 | 5.00 | 8.00 | 13.00 |
Other Support Services: | 24.17 | 42.74 | 39.55 | 32.81 | 40.00 | 40.00 | 41.30 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 17.29 | 14.35 | 15.14 | 16.12 | 15.02 | 11.77 | 16.96 |
Schools
Cardington Intermediate School | Grade 5 to Grade 6 | 349 Chesterville Ave, Cardington OH 43315 | |
Cardington-Lincoln Elementary School | Prekindergarten to Grade 4 | 121 Nichols St, Cardington OH 43315 | |
Cardington-Lincoln High School | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 349 Chesterville Ave, Cardington OH 43315 | |
Cardington-Lincoln Middle School | Grade 7 to Grade 8 | 349 Chesterville Ave, Cardington OH 43315 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
OAA Test | |||||
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 70.4% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 74.9% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 84% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 79.3% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 81.3% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 76.9% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 82% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 79.8% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 78.3% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 78.2% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 77.3% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 73.2% | 75.1% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 76% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84% | 77.4% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 77.4% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 78.4% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93% | 79.9% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 97.5% | 79% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 81.4% |
2004 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 55.3% | 65.8% |
2005 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 59.4% | 65.5% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.6% | 76.9% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 69% | 76% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.1% | 74.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 78.4% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 76.2% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.5% | 78.1% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.7% | 78.4% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 77.6% |
2004 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.1% | 70.8% |
2005 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 74% | 76.6% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 76.8% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 81.1% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 82% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 83.8% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 83.3% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 87.7% |
2004 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 78.6% |
2005 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.9% | 78.1% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 85.9% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 75% | 82% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 81.7% |
2009 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 84.4% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 49.5% | 62.7% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.2% | 61% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 60% | 61.8% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.5% | 62.3% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 67% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.7% | 66.1% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.5% | 67.5% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.3% | 68.3% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 76.9% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 75.3% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 72.7% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 68.6% | 72% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 71.8% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 74.1% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 76.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 74.2% |
2007 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 68% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.3% | 66.4% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 74.4% | 70.6% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 69.9% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.8% | 71.1% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 72.5% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 67.6% |
2007 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.4% | 57% |
2008 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.3% | 64.8% |
2009 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 51.2% | 61.6% |
2004 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 67.9% | 65.6% |
2005 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 71.3% | 62.5% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 55.8% | 68.4% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 74% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 76.6% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 75.2% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 78% | 77.4% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 77.5% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 79.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.0% | 74.7% |
2004 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 59.5% | 64.6% |
2005 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 76.6% | 69.8% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 83.6% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 78% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 79.7% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 81.3% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 85.6% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.0% | 86.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 82.8% |
2005 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 37.2% | 58.5% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 63.2% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 71.6% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 48.4% | 68.8% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 71.8% | 74.3% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 55.4% | 71.1% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 74.8% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.8% | 73.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 71.9% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 78.9% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 77% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.6% | 77.3% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 74.1% | 76.6% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 80.2% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 77.3% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.6% | 79.5% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 81% |
2007 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 81% |
2008 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 85.7% |
2009 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 80.5% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 52% | 60.1% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 62.9% | 68.6% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 59.4% | 72.8% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 41.7% | 70.6% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 59.3% | 69.2% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 64.2% | 74.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.3% | 79.6% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.1% | 76.6% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 78.9% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.5% | 77.1% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 72.5% | 79.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 53.1% | 72.4% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 79% | 80.9% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 85.1% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 83% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.2% | 85.7% |
2007 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 62% |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 53.5% | 62.2% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 52.1% | 62.8% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.9% | 64.8% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 79% | 67.4% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 71.5% |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 64.6% | 68.6% |
2007 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 45.9% | 49% |
2008 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 37.3% | 53.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 31.3% | 51.1% |
OGT Test | |||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 58.2% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.7% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 56% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 53.7% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.7% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.1% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.1% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.2% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.3% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.8% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 84% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.3% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 89% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 81% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 83% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.4% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 89% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.9% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.0% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.4% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $11,966,000 | $11,142 | $12,483,000 | $10,969 | $12,557,000 | $10,862 | |||
Federal: | $866,000 | $806 | 7.2% | $872,000 | $766 | 7.0% | $946,000 | $818 | 7.5% |
State: | $7,321,000 | $6,817 | 61.2% | $7,725,000 | $6,788 | 61.9% | $7,777,000 | $6,728 | 61.9% |
Local: | $3,779,000 | $3,519 | 31.6% | $3,886,000 | $3,415 | 31.1% | $3,834,000 | $3,317 | 30.5% |
Total Expenditures: | $11,653,000 | $10,850 | $11,365,000 | $9,987 | $11,904,000 | $10,298 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $10,493,000 | $9,770 | $10,406,000 | $9,144 | $11,009,000 | $9,523 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $5,981,000 | $5,569 | 57.0% | $6,102,000 | $5,362 | 58.6% | $6,654,000 | $5,756 | 60.4% |
Student and Staff Support: | $650,000 | $605 | 6.2% | $773,000 | $679 | 7.4% | $836,000 | $723 | 7.6% |
Administration: | $1,212,000 | $1,128 | 11.6% | $1,263,000 | $1,110 | 12.1% | $1,280,000 | $1,107 | 11.6% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $2,650,000 | $2,467 | 25.3% | $2,268,000 | $1,993 | 21.8% | $2,239,000 | $1,937 | 20.3% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $208,000 | $194 | $33,000 | $29 | $30,000 | $26 | |||
Construction: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $153,000 | $142 | $166,000 | $146 | $179,000 | $155 | |||
Total Salary: | $6,098,000 | $5,678 | $6,491,000 | $5,704 | $6,584,000 | $5,696 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $4,260,000 | $3,966 | 69.9% | $4,268,000 | $3,750 | 65.8% | $4,484,000 | $3,879 | 68.1% |
Other Salary: | $1,838,000 | $1,711 | 30.1% | $2,223,000 | $1,953 | 34.2% | $2,100,000 | $1,817 | 31.9% |
Total Benefit: | $2,297,000 | $2,139 | $2,350,000 | $2,065 | $2,523,000 | $2,183 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $1,313,000 | $1,223 | 57.2% | $1,418,000 | $1,246 | 60.3% | $1,476,000 | $1,277 | 58.5% |
Other Benefit: | $984,000 | $916 | 42.8% | $932,000 | $819 | 39.7% | $1,047,000 | $906 | 41.5% |
* Cardington-Lincoln Local School District was rated 1.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.