Newton Local School District
Newton Local School District is located in west Ohio. Newton Local School District has 38.89 square miles of land area and 0.33 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Newton Local School District population is 3,272. Newton Local School District median household income is $52,260 in 2010-2014. Newton Local School District median house value is $138,300 in 2010-2014. On average, Newton Local School District is much better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Newton Local School District Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
201 North Long St
Pleasant Hill OH, 45359, Miami County
Phone: 937-676-2002
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 581 | 574 | 577 | 580 | 523 | 569 | 561 |
English Language Learner Students: | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 41.35 | 38.85 | 34.78 | 35.12 | 34.82 | 35.20 | 35.10 |
Prekindergarten: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | 3.33 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.29 | 1.30 | 1.30 |
Elementary: | 15.81 | 17.42 | 17.98 | 17.92 | 17.62 | 17.30 | 16.90 |
Secondary: | 16.86 | 15.58 | 15.24 | 15.66 | 15.67 | 15.60 | 15.60 |
Ungraded: | 5.35 | 4.85 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.24 | 1.00 | 1.30 |
Total Other Staff: | 38.37 | 37.07 | 40.07 | 35.39 | 38.42 | 34.50 | 37.00 |
Instructional Aides: | 7.00 | 7.00 | 6.00 | 4.32 | 4.32 | 1.30 | 2.10 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrators: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 |
District Administrative Support: | 3.20 | 3.20 | 3.20 | 2.20 | 2.20 | 2.30 | 3.00 |
School Administrators: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | 5.50 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2.50 |
Student Support Services: | 3.70 | 3.40 | 3.40 | 3.40 | 3.40 | 1.40 | 1.40 |
Other Support Services: | 14.00 | 14.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 17.00 | 19.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.05 | 14.77 | 16.59 | 16.51 | 15.02 | 16.16 | 15.98 |
Schools
Newton Elementary School | Kindergarten to Grade 6 | 201 North Long St, Pleasant Hill OH 45359 | |
Newton High School | Grade 7 to Grade 12 | 201 North Long St, Pleasant Hill OH 45359 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
OAA Test | |||||
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 70.4% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 74.9% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 84% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 79.3% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 81.3% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 76.9% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 82% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 79.8% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.0% | 78.3% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 78.2% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 77.3% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 75.1% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 76% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 77.4% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 77.4% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 78.4% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 79.9% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.0% | 81.4% |
2004 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 65.8% |
2005 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 65.5% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 76.9% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.3% | 76% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 74.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 78.4% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 76.2% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 78.1% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 78.4% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 77.6% |
2004 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 70.8% |
2005 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 76.6% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 76.8% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 81.1% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 82% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 83.8% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 83.3% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 87.7% |
2004 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 75.7% | 78.6% |
2005 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 78.1% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 85.9% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 82% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 81.7% |
2009 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 84.4% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 62.7% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 74.4% | 61% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 61.8% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 62.3% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 67% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 66.1% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 67.5% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 68.3% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 76.9% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 75.3% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 72.7% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 85% | 72% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 71.8% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 100% | 74.1% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 76.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 74.2% |
2007 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 68% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 95% | 66.4% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 85% | 70.6% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 69.9% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 71.1% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.0% | 72.5% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 67.6% |
2007 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 57% |
2008 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.5% | 64.8% |
2009 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 61.6% |
2004 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.1% | 65.6% |
2005 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 62.5% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 68.4% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 74% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 76.6% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 75.2% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 77.4% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 77.5% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 74.7% |
2004 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 69.8% | 64.6% |
2005 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 100% | 69.8% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 83.6% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 78% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 79.7% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 81.3% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 85.6% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 86.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 82.8% |
2005 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 46.3% | 58.5% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 63.2% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 68.8% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.5% | 74.3% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 71.1% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 74.8% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 73.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 97% | 78.9% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 77% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 77.3% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 76.6% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 93% | 80.2% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 77.3% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 79.5% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 81% |
2007 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 81% |
2008 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 85.7% |
2009 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 80.5% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.1% | 60.1% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 48.8% | 68.6% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.8% | 72.8% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 70.6% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 72.1% | 69.2% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 74.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.3% | 79.6% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.8% | 76.6% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 78.9% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.5% | 77.1% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.2% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 79.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 72.4% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 80.9% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 85.1% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 83% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 85.7% |
2007 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 62% |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.8% | 62.2% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.5% | 62.8% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 64.8% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 67.4% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 71.5% |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 68.6% |
2007 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 50% | 49% |
2008 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.5% | 53.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 43.2% | 51.1% |
OGT Test | |||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.4% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 98% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.3% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.4% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.8% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 100% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 98% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 100% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.1% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.5% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 100% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 100% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $6,768,000 | $11,730 | $6,747,000 | $11,633 | $10,655,000 | $20,373 | |||
Federal: | $484,000 | $839 | 7.2% | $528,000 | $910 | 7.8% | $551,000 | $1,054 | 5.2% |
State: | $2,446,000 | $4,239 | 36.1% | $2,532,000 | $4,366 | 37.5% | $6,228,000 | $11,908 | 58.5% |
Local: | $3,838,000 | $6,652 | 56.7% | $3,687,000 | $6,357 | 54.6% | $3,876,000 | $7,411 | 36.4% |
Total Expenditures: | $6,192,000 | $10,731 | $11,501,000 | $19,829 | $15,960,000 | $30,516 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $5,369,000 | $9,305 | $5,313,000 | $9,160 | $4,943,000 | $9,451 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $3,110,000 | $5,390 | 57.9% | $2,905,000 | $5,009 | 54.7% | $2,694,000 | $5,151 | 54.5% |
Student and Staff Support: | $399,000 | $692 | 7.4% | $465,000 | $802 | 8.8% | $492,000 | $941 | 10.0% |
Administration: | $874,000 | $1,515 | 16.3% | $951,000 | $1,640 | 17.9% | $962,000 | $1,839 | 19.5% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $986,000 | $1,709 | 18.4% | $992,000 | $1,710 | 18.7% | $795,000 | $1,520 | 16.1% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $421,000 | $730 | $5,704,000 | $9,834 | $10,724,000 | $20,505 | |||
Construction: | $272,000 | $471 | $4,435,000 | $7,647 | $9,961,000 | $19,046 | |||
Total Other: | $52,000 | $90 | $60,000 | $103 | $54,000 | $103 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $290,000 | $503 | $305,000 | $526 | $172,000 | $329 | |||
Total Salary: | $2,942,000 | $5,099 | $2,969,000 | $5,119 | $2,846,000 | $5,442 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $1,914,000 | $3,317 | 65.1% | $1,895,000 | $3,267 | 63.8% | $1,834,000 | $3,507 | 64.4% |
Other Salary: | $1,028,000 | $1,782 | 34.9% | $1,074,000 | $1,852 | 36.2% | $1,012,000 | $1,935 | 35.6% |
Total Benefit: | $1,086,000 | $1,882 | $1,098,000 | $1,893 | $1,018,000 | $1,946 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $631,000 | $1,094 | 58.1% | $600,000 | $1,034 | 54.6% | $584,000 | $1,117 | 57.4% |
Other Benefit: | $455,000 | $789 | 41.9% | $498,000 | $859 | 45.4% | $434,000 | $830 | 42.6% |
* Newton Local School District was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.