Pennoyer School District 79
Pennoyer School District 79 is located in northeast Illinois. Pennoyer School District 79 has 0.66 square miles of land area and has no water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Pennoyer School District 79 population is 5,894. Pennoyer School District 79 median household income is $53,633 in 2010-2014. Pennoyer School District 79 median house value is $239,200 in 2010-2014. On average, Pennoyer School District 79 is better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Pennoyer School District 79 Map and Nearby Locations
5200 North Cumberland Ave
Harwood Heights IL, 60706, Cook County
Phone: 708-456-9094
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 427 | 413 | 392 | 418 | 405 | 398 | 396 |
English Language Learner Students: | 57 | 42 | 37 | 36 | 36 | 46 | 29 |
Total Teachers: | 30.60 | NA | 28.50 | 27.71 | 27.50 | 27.50 | 24.40 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 3.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 |
Elementary: | 28.60 | NA | 25.50 | 27.71 | 24.50 | 24.50 | 19.40 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 3.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 5.00 | 33.50 | 5.00 | 5.29 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 8.00 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 5.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 3.50 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 2.00 | 2.20 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Other Support Services: | 3.00 | 24.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 3.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 13.95 | NA | 13.75 | 15.08 | 14.73 | 14.47 | 16.23 |
Schools
Pennoyer Elementary School | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 5200 North Cumberland Ave, Harwood Heights IL 60706 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 71.1% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 51.3% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 64.1% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 74.2% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 46.2% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 74.3% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.7% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.7% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.2% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.5% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 52.7% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.1% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.0% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.4% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.0% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 58.2% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.7% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.0% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.5% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.0% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 55.9% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 95% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 62.0% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 97.2% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 62.0% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 96% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 68.3% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.8% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 98.1% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 98% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 64.8% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 95% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 95% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 71.1% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.0% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 98.0% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.0% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.0% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $5,033,000 | $12,839 | $4,766,000 | $11,402 | $4,852,000 | $11,980 | |||
Federal: | $129,000 | $329 | 2.6% | $125,000 | $299 | 2.6% | $208,000 | $514 | 4.3% |
State: | $1,019,000 | $2,599 | 20.2% | $947,000 | $2,266 | 19.9% | $833,000 | $2,057 | 17.2% |
Local: | $3,885,000 | $9,911 | 77.2% | $3,694,000 | $8,837 | 77.5% | $3,811,000 | $9,410 | 78.5% |
Total Expenditures: | $5,781,000 | $14,747 | $5,045,000 | $12,069 | $4,823,000 | $11,909 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $4,822,000 | $12,301 | $4,515,000 | $10,801 | $4,319,000 | $10,664 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $2,682,000 | $6,842 | 55.6% | $2,508,000 | $6,000 | 55.5% | $2,299,000 | $5,677 | 53.2% |
Student and Staff Support: | $315,000 | $804 | 6.5% | $243,000 | $581 | 5.4% | $246,000 | $607 | 5.7% |
Administration: | $1,211,000 | $3,089 | 25.1% | $1,145,000 | $2,739 | 25.4% | $1,128,000 | $2,785 | 26.1% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $614,000 | $1,566 | 12.7% | $619,000 | $1,481 | 13.7% | $646,000 | $1,595 | 15.0% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $450,000 | $1,148 | $184,000 | $440 | $67,000 | $165 | |||
Construction: | $374,000 | $954 | $20,000 | $48 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $99,000 | $253 | $86,000 | $206 | $92,000 | $227 | |||
Total Salary: | $2,812,000 | $7,173 | $2,663,000 | $6,371 | $2,558,000 | $6,316 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $1,997,000 | $5,094 | 71.0% | $1,907,000 | $4,562 | 71.6% | $1,765,000 | $4,358 | 69.0% |
Other Salary: | $815,000 | $2,079 | 29.0% | $756,000 | $1,809 | 28.4% | $793,000 | $1,958 | 31.0% |
Total Benefit: | $1,230,000 | $3,138 | $1,115,000 | $2,667 | $1,047,000 | $2,585 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $548,000 | $1,398 | 44.6% | $497,000 | $1,189 | 44.6% | $447,000 | $1,104 | 42.7% |
Other Benefit: | $682,000 | $1,740 | 55.4% | $618,000 | $1,478 | 55.4% | $600,000 | $1,481 | 57.3% |
* Pennoyer School District 79 was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.