Fairmont School District 89
Fairmont School District 89 is located in northeast Illinois. Fairmont School District 89 has 4.03 square miles of land area and 0.06 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Fairmont School District 89 population is 3,876. Fairmont School District 89 median household income is $44,127 in 2010-2014. Fairmont School District 89 median house value is $169,400 in 2010-2014. On average, Fairmont School District 89 is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Fairmont School District 89 Map and Nearby Locations
735 Green Garden Place
Lockport IL, 60441, Will County
Phone: 815-726-6318
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 294 | 319 | 291 | 247 | 304 | 307 | 324 |
English Language Learner Students: | 32 | 29 | 28 | 25 | 26 | 12 | 13 |
Total Teachers: | 23.60 | NA | 20.11 | 25.08 | 26.22 | 29.10 | 26.00 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary: | 23.60 | NA | 17.11 | 24.40 | 23.22 | 26.10 | 16.00 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.68 | 1.00 | NA | 6.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 10.46 | 19.00 | 5.00 | 4.19 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 5.00 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 9.50 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 1.96 | NA | 2.00 | 1.09 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 2.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 3.00 | NA | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 2.00 | 1.10 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 |
Other Support Services: | 5.50 | 7.50 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 12.46 | NA | 14.47 | 9.85 | 11.59 | 10.55 | 12.46 |
Schools
Fairmont School | ![]() | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 735 Green Garden Place, Lockport IL 60441 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 59.2% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 47.7% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 70.9% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 74.2% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 34.4% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 41.2% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 28.6% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 40.7% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 36.9% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 47.7% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 47.6% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 60.7% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 58.1% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 34.4% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 55.5% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 44% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 61.9% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 52.1% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 20.7% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 39.1% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 62.6% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 40.7% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 32% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 52.4% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 34.7% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 63.9% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 27.6% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 29.2% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 17.9% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 38.7% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 60.8% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 50% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 37% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 20% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 42.9% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 34.8% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 51.4% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 26.5% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 37.3% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 52.2% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.0% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 47.4% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 20.6% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 26.5% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 36.9% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 28.0% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 37.5% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 34.7% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 55.5% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 31.6% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 56% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 32.4% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 45.5% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 52% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 61.2% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 54.3% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 41.2% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 40.0% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 36.4% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 61.6% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 53.0% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 64.3% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 28.0% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 27.5% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 39.3% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 45.2% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 37.0% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 50% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 27.5% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 42.9% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 57.2% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 42.0% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 22.2% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 44.4% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 44.5% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 52.7% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 33.4% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 55.6% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 72% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 45.4% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.3% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 38.9% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 74.1% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 7% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 16.1% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 14.6% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.9% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 17.5% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 38.1% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 53.2% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 22.2% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 26.2% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 43.3% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 40.5% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 45.8% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.8% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 42.5% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.8% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 50% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 65.4% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 33.4% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $4,959,000 | $17,041 | $5,459,000 | $22,101 | $5,238,000 | $17,230 | |||
Federal: | $411,000 | $1,412 | 8.3% | $480,000 | $1,943 | 8.8% | $869,000 | $2,859 | 16.6% |
State: | $1,953,000 | $6,711 | 39.4% | $2,292,000 | $9,279 | 42.0% | $1,940,000 | $6,382 | 37.0% |
Local: | $2,595,000 | $8,918 | 52.3% | $2,687,000 | $10,879 | 49.2% | $2,429,000 | $7,990 | 46.4% |
Total Expenditures: | $4,587,000 | $15,763 | $4,938,000 | $19,992 | $5,779,000 | $19,010 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $3,892,000 | $13,375 | $4,147,000 | $16,789 | $5,042,000 | $16,586 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,595,000 | $5,481 | 41.0% | $1,797,000 | $7,275 | 43.3% | $2,453,000 | $8,069 | 48.7% |
Student and Staff Support: | $348,000 | $1,196 | 8.9% | $402,000 | $1,628 | 9.7% | $585,000 | $1,924 | 11.6% |
Administration: | $1,084,000 | $3,725 | 27.9% | $1,140,000 | $4,615 | 27.5% | $1,120,000 | $3,684 | 22.2% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $865,000 | $2,973 | 22.2% | $808,000 | $3,271 | 19.5% | $884,000 | $2,908 | 17.5% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $167,000 | $574 | $194,000 | $785 | $264,000 | $868 | |||
Construction: | $50,000 | $172 | $100,000 | $405 | $167,000 | $549 | |||
Total Other: | $34,000 | $117 | $4,000 | $16 | $50,000 | $164 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $75,000 | $258 | $87,000 | $352 | $84,000 | $276 | |||
Total Salary: | $2,003,000 | $6,883 | $2,109,000 | $8,538 | $2,621,000 | $8,622 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $1,082,000 | $3,718 | 54.0% | $1,185,000 | $4,798 | 56.2% | $1,556,000 | $5,118 | 59.4% |
Other Salary: | $921,000 | $3,165 | 46.0% | $924,000 | $3,741 | 43.8% | $1,065,000 | $3,503 | 40.6% |
Total Benefit: | $865,000 | $2,973 | $853,000 | $3,453 | $1,152,000 | $3,789 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $409,000 | $1,405 | 47.3% | $422,000 | $1,709 | 49.5% | $557,000 | $1,832 | 48.4% |
Other Benefit: | $456,000 | $1,567 | 52.7% | $431,000 | $1,745 | 50.5% | $595,000 | $1,957 | 51.6% |
* Fairmont School District 89 was rated 1 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.