Bannockburn School District 106
Bannockburn School District 106 is located in northeast Illinois. Bannockburn School District 106 has 2.78 square miles of land area and 0.03 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Bannockburn School District 106 population is 2,177. Bannockburn School District 106 median household income is $140,625 in 2010-2014. Bannockburn School District 106 median house value is $848,800 in 2010-2014. On average, Bannockburn School District 106 is much better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Bannockburn School District 106 Map and Nearby Locations
2165 Telegraph Rd
Deerfield IL, 60015, Lake County
Phone: 847-945-5900
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 187 | 176 | 177 | 197 | 205 | 195 | 179 |
English Language Learner Students: | 17 | 14 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
Total Teachers: | 18.83 | NA | 18.06 | 18.04 | 17.55 | 17.60 | 16.30 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 1.40 | 0.90 |
Elementary: | 17.83 | NA | 18.06 | 18.04 | 16.65 | 16.20 | 12.70 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 2.70 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 2.88 | 9.92 | 2.28 | 2.36 | 3.28 | 2.50 | 6.00 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 4.32 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 1.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 1.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 0.38 | NA | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.40 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 3.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 0.50 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.20 |
Other Support Services: | 0.00 | 2.20 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.40 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 9.93 | NA | 9.80 | 10.92 | 11.68 | 11.08 | 10.98 |
Schools
Bannockburn School | Kindergarten to Grade 8 | 2165 Telegraph Rd, Deerfield IL 60015 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.8% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.0% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.0% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 96% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.1% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 96% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 100% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 100.1% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 96% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 100% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.1% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 100% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 100% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.1% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $7,112,000 | $40,181 | $6,984,000 | $35,452 | $6,459,000 | $31,507 | |||
Federal: | $68,000 | $384 | 1.0% | $148,000 | $751 | 2.1% | $188,000 | $917 | 2.9% |
State: | $633,000 | $3,576 | 8.9% | $592,000 | $3,005 | 8.5% | $618,000 | $3,015 | 9.6% |
Local: | $6,411,000 | $36,220 | 90.1% | $6,244,000 | $31,695 | 89.4% | $5,653,000 | $27,576 | 87.5% |
Total Expenditures: | $5,002,000 | $28,260 | $7,499,000 | $38,066 | $5,367,000 | $26,180 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $3,764,000 | $21,266 | $3,899,000 | $19,792 | $3,551,000 | $17,322 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $2,065,000 | $11,667 | 54.9% | $2,246,000 | $11,401 | 57.6% | $1,981,000 | $9,663 | 55.8% |
Student and Staff Support: | $528,000 | $2,983 | 14.0% | $531,000 | $2,695 | 13.6% | $455,000 | $2,220 | 12.8% |
Administration: | $678,000 | $3,831 | 18.0% | $643,000 | $3,264 | 16.5% | $622,000 | $3,034 | 17.5% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $493,000 | $2,785 | 13.1% | $479,000 | $2,431 | 12.3% | $493,000 | $2,405 | 13.9% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $290,000 | $1,638 | $2,624,000 | $13,320 | $781,000 | $3,810 | |||
Construction: | $144,000 | $814 | $2,557,000 | $12,980 | $324,000 | $1,580 | |||
Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Salary: | $2,155,000 | $12,175 | $2,298,000 | $11,665 | $2,097,000 | $10,229 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $1,380,000 | $7,797 | 64.0% | $1,547,000 | $7,853 | 67.3% | $1,419,000 | $6,922 | 67.7% |
Other Salary: | $775,000 | $4,379 | 36.0% | $751,000 | $3,812 | 32.7% | $678,000 | $3,307 | 32.3% |
Total Benefit: | $894,000 | $5,051 | $835,000 | $4,239 | $849,000 | $4,141 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $546,000 | $3,085 | 61.1% | $528,000 | $2,680 | 63.2% | $552,000 | $2,693 | 65.0% |
Other Benefit: | $348,000 | $1,966 | 38.9% | $307,000 | $1,558 | 36.8% | $297,000 | $1,449 | 35.0% |
* Bannockburn School District 106 was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.