Highland Joint School District 305
Highland Joint School District 305 is located in northwest Idaho. Highland Joint School District 305 has 347.64 square miles of land area and 0.53 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Highland Joint School District 305 population is 1,334. Highland Joint School District 305 median household income is $40,536 in 2010-2014. Highland Joint School District 305 median house value is $119,900 in 2010-2014. On average, Highland Joint School District 305 is close to the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Highland Joint School District 305 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
112 Blvd
Craigmont ID, 83523, Lewis County
Phone: 208-924-5211
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 191 | 187 | 184 | 173 | 178 | 188 | 213 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 16.55 | 15.65 | 15.99 | 15.76 | 16.92 | 16.40 | 17.70 |
Prekindergarten: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
Kindergarten: | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Elementary: | 5.50 | 5.40 | 6.00 | 5.89 | 7.36 | 7.50 | 7.90 |
Secondary: | 10.05 | 9.56 | 9.30 | 9.37 | 8.72 | 8.10 | 9.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 5.38 | 3.00 | 8.32 | 10.36 | 9.88 | 10.90 | 10.80 |
Instructional Aides: | 2.10 | 2.96 | 2.75 | 2.94 | 2.31 | 2.10 | 2.30 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | NA | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.90 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | NA | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.60 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.40 | 0.30 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
District Administrators: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 |
District Administrative Support: | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrators: | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
Student Support Services: | 3.20 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
Other Support Services: | NA | NA | 3.20 | 4.01 | 3.46 | 3.70 | 3.60 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 11.54 | 11.95 | 11.51 | 10.98 | 10.52 | 11.46 | 12.03 |
Schools
Highland School | Prekindergarten to Grade 12 | 112 Blvd, Craigmont ID 83523 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2008 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 41.6% | 68.8% |
2009 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 40.7% |
2010 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 71.5% |
2011 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 72.6% |
2012 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 100% | 76.6% |
2013 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 72.3% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.3% | 76.7% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 44% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 76.8% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 78.5% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 100% | 78% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 76.4% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 85.7% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 58.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 86.4% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 100% | 87.6% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 89.2% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 66.9% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 68.6% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 67.9% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 69.3% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 72.5% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 53.9% | 72.7% |
2008 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 58.4% | 70% |
2009 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 73.3% |
2010 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77% | 73.1% |
2011 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 73.7% |
2013 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50% | 72.9% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100% | 87.5% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 86.6% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 87.7% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 88.6% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100% | 89.7% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 82.7% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 86.8% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 88.9% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 89.2% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100% | 89.4% |
2008 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.5% | 77.6% |
2009 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 80.4% |
2010 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 81.9% |
2011 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 81.1% |
2012 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 84.8% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 84.2% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 85.6% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 84.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 60% | 83.4% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 86.8% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 82.5% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 86.3% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.8% | 86.2% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 86.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 71.5% | 88.9% |
2009 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 77.2% |
2010 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 77.2% |
2011 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 78.7% |
2012 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 70% | 79.4% |
2013 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.7% | 80.1% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 77.9% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 79.8% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 80.9% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 30% | 78.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 50% | 79.2% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 86.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 88% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 88.1% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 60% | 87.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 88.5% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 43.8% | 66.4% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 64.9% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 67.4% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 40% | 69.3% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 40.9% | 72.2% |
2008 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 71.7% |
2010 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 80% | 75.1% |
2011 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 75.4% |
2012 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 76.5% |
2013 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 73.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 77.1% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 80% | 79.2% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 75% | 77.5% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 79% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 54.6% | 77.8% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 81.6% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 85.8% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 88.4% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 89.5% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 63.7% | 86.7% |
2008 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 47.1% | 69% |
2011 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 73.5% |
2012 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 50% | 74.2% |
2013 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 74.6% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 74.8% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 74.5% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 80% | 75.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 80.7% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 87.7% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 90.8% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 88.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 29.4% | 51% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 57.2% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 70% | 59.4% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 53.9% | 56.8% |
2008 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 36.4% | 66.6% |
2009 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 47.4% | 71.5% |
2011 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 71.2% |
2012 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 52.9% | 72.8% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 78.6% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 63.1% | 78.4% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 79.5% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 78.8% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 88.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 63.2% | 91.4% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 92.6% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 92.3% |
2010 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 35.7% | 63.3% |
2011 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 62.8% |
2012 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 61.6% | 66.1% |
2013 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 46.7% | 62.4% |
2010 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 64.2% | 69.9% |
2011 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 69.5% |
2012 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 68.8% |
2013 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 60% | 66.6% |
2010 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 64.2% | 80.8% |
2011 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 80% | 81% |
2012 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 80.9% |
2013 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 82.3% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $2,307,000 | $12,538 | $2,195,000 | $12,688 | $2,451,000 | $13,770 | |||
Federal: | $250,000 | $1,359 | 10.8% | $106,000 | $613 | 4.8% | $479,000 | $2,691 | 19.5% |
State: | $1,523,000 | $8,277 | 66.0% | $1,582,000 | $9,145 | 72.1% | $1,539,000 | $8,646 | 62.8% |
Local: | $534,000 | $2,902 | 23.1% | $507,000 | $2,931 | 23.1% | $433,000 | $2,433 | 17.7% |
Total Expenditures: | $2,276,000 | $12,370 | $2,301,000 | $13,301 | $2,437,000 | $13,691 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $2,162,000 | $11,750 | $2,120,000 | $12,254 | $2,410,000 | $13,539 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,147,000 | $6,234 | 53.1% | $1,230,000 | $7,110 | 58.0% | $1,351,000 | $7,590 | 56.1% |
Student and Staff Support: | $123,000 | $668 | 5.7% | $62,000 | $358 | 2.9% | $153,000 | $860 | 6.3% |
Administration: | $293,000 | $1,592 | 13.6% | $278,000 | $1,607 | 13.1% | $320,000 | $1,798 | 13.3% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $599,000 | $3,255 | 27.7% | $550,000 | $3,179 | 25.9% | $586,000 | $3,292 | 24.3% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $114,000 | $620 | $181,000 | $1,046 | $27,000 | $152 | |||
Construction: | $80,000 | $435 | $112,000 | $647 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Salary: | $1,142,000 | $6,207 | $1,175,000 | $6,792 | $1,282,000 | $7,202 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $797,000 | $4,332 | 69.8% | $861,000 | $4,977 | 73.3% | $863,000 | $4,848 | 67.3% |
Other Salary: | $345,000 | $1,875 | 30.2% | $314,000 | $1,815 | 26.7% | $419,000 | $2,354 | 32.7% |
Total Benefit: | $387,000 | $2,103 | $387,000 | $2,237 | $406,000 | $2,281 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $266,000 | $1,446 | 68.7% | $295,000 | $1,705 | 76.2% | $271,000 | $1,522 | 66.7% |
Other Benefit: | $121,000 | $658 | 31.3% | $92,000 | $532 | 23.8% | $135,000 | $758 | 33.3% |
Teacher's Experience and Compensation
2007 | |
Teachers with Bachelor Degree: | 93.8% |
Teachers with Master or PhD Degree: | NA |
Mean Number of Years of Teaching: | 18.0 years |
Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | NA |
Teachers with 6-10 Years of Experience: | 18.8% |
Teachers with 11-20 Years of Experience: | 37.5% |
Teachers with 21-30 Years of Experience: | 25.0% |
Teachers with 31 Years of Experience or More: | NA |
Mean Base Salary: | $47,159.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | NA |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 6-10 Years of Experience: | $37,401.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 11-20 Years of Experience: | $49,806.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 21-30 Years of Experience: | $51,941.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 31 Years of Experience or More: | NA |
* Highland Joint School District 305 was rated 3 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.