Tuscarawas Valley High School
2637 Tusky Valley Rd Ne Mineral City OH, 44656, Tuscarawas County Phone: 330-859-2421 Ranking: (228 out of 821, top 28%)* Type: Regular High School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12 School District: Tuscarawas Valley Local School District Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 22 | 24 | 31 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 26 | |||||||
Total Students: | 444 | 425 | 431 | 435 | 440 | 516 | 540 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 122 | 27.5% | 118 | 27.8% | 141 | 32.7% | 128 | 29.4% | 132 | 30.0% | 130 | 25.2% | 140 | 25.9% |
Grade 10: | 120 | 27.0% | 134 | 31.5% | 124 | 28.8% | 131 | 30.1% | 119 | 27.0% | 143 | 27.7% | 129 | 23.9% |
Grade 11: | 102 | 23.0% | 92 | 21.6% | 79 | 18.3% | 93 | 21.4% | 99 | 22.5% | 126 | 24.4% | 122 | 22.6% |
Grade 12: | 100 | 22.5% | 81 | 19.1% | 87 | 20.2% | 83 | 19.1% | 90 | 20.5% | 117 | 22.7% | 149 | 27.6% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 249 | 56.1% | 248 | 58.4% | 238 | 55.2% | 244 | 56.1% | 230 | 52.3% | 265 | 51.4% | 281 | 52.0% |
Female: | 195 | 43.9% | 177 | 41.6% | 193 | 44.8% | 191 | 43.9% | 197 | 44.8% | 237 | 45.9% | 252 | 46.7% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 2 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Hispanic: | 5 | 1.1% | 5 | 1.2% | 3 | 0.7% | 3 | 0.7% | 3 | 0.7% | 3 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.4% |
Black: | 2 | 0.5% | 3 | 0.7% | 4 | 0.9% | 2 | 0.5% | 2 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% |
White: | 427 | 96.2% | 408 | 96.0% | 413 | 95.8% | 418 | 96.1% | 429 | 97.5% | 506 | 98.1% | 535 | 99.1% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 8 | 1.8% | 8 | 1.9% | 9 | 2.1% | 9 | 2.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 105 | 23.6% | 108 | 25.4% | 150 | 34.8% | 86 | 19.8% | 85 | 19.3% | 48 | 9.3% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 38 | 8.6% | 42 | 9.9% | 26 | 6.0% | 27 | 6.2% | 29 | 6.6% | 27 | 5.2% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 20.60 | 17.61 | 13.79 | 16.84 | 16.42 | 18.40 | 20.80 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 81.3% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 86.8% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 92.3% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 86.1% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 86.9% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 89.3% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 93.9% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 87.7% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 94.6% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 92.7% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.4% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 96.7% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 91.3% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.6% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 95.1% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 90.2% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 91.7% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 84.5% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 86.1% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 87.9% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 86.9% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.8% | 84.8% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 79.1% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 86.1% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 86.4% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 86.4% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 88.1% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 87.9% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 88.5% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 89.1% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.2% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 84.4% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82.8% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 90.2% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 89.1% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 91.4% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.3% | 98.3% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 96.7% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 97.8% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 95.9% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 93.4% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 95.5% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 94.5% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.4% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 97.8% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 95.8% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 94.2% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 95.5% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.4% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 96.7% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 94.8% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 96.6% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.0% | 95.0% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 93.6% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 95.7% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 94.2% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 95.5% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 93.3% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 94.5% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 96.6% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 96.3% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 92.4% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 89.2% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 96.4% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.4% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.5% | 97.5% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 94.8% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 96.6% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 94.2% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Tuscarawas Valley High School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.