Timken High School
521 Tuscarawas St West
Canton OH, 44702, Stark County
Phone: 330-438-2602
Ranking: (747 out of 821, bottom 9%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Canton City School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 78 | 89 | 83 | 85 | 93 | 113 | 105 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,103 | 1,008 | 1,003 | 1,027 | 1,175 | 1,272 | 1,189 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 345 | 31.3% | 304 | 30.2% | 264 | 26.3% | 234 | 22.8% | 285 | 24.3% | 295 | 23.2% | 305 | 25.7% |
Grade 10: | 294 | 26.7% | 263 | 26.1% | 238 | 23.7% | 261 | 25.4% | 295 | 25.1% | 307 | 24.1% | 333 | 28.0% |
Grade 11: | 257 | 23.3% | 209 | 20.7% | 248 | 24.7% | 251 | 24.4% | 284 | 24.2% | 336 | 26.4% | 334 | 28.1% |
Grade 12: | 207 | 18.8% | 232 | 23.0% | 253 | 25.2% | 281 | 27.4% | 311 | 26.5% | 334 | 26.3% | 217 | 18.3% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 563 | 51.0% | 540 | 53.6% | 514 | 51.2% | 532 | 51.8% | 539 | 45.9% | 622 | 48.9% | 574 | 48.3% |
Female: | 540 | 49.0% | 468 | 46.4% | 489 | 48.8% | 495 | 48.2% | 505 | 43.0% | 540 | 42.5% | 517 | 43.5% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.3% | 4 | 0.4% | 5 | 0.4% | 6 | 0.5% | 3 | 0.3% |
Asian: | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.2% | 4 | 0.3% |
Hispanic: | 23 | 2.1% | 17 | 1.7% | 12 | 1.2% | 13 | 1.3% | 12 | 1.0% | 10 | 0.8% | 14 | 1.2% |
Black: | 465 | 42.2% | 397 | 39.4% | 417 | 41.6% | 426 | 41.5% | 476 | 40.5% | 536 | 42.1% | 505 | 42.5% |
White: | 471 | 42.7% | 466 | 46.2% | 451 | 45.0% | 463 | 45.1% | 556 | 47.3% | 615 | 48.3% | 569 | 47.9% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 141 | 12.8% | 124 | 12.3% | 120 | 12.0% | 119 | 11.6% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 878 | 79.6% | 777 | 77.1% | 891 | 88.8% | 876 | 85.3% | 738 | 62.8% | 843 | 66.3% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 82 | 7.4% | 68 | 6.7% | 78 | 7.8% | 60 | 5.8% | 81 | 6.9% | 77 | 6.1% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.14 | 11.33 | 12.08 | 12.05 | 12.66 | 11.30 | 11.30 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 33.6% | 44.8% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 57.9% | 61.4% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.1% | 69.5% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 70.4% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 53.3% | 62% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.5% | 67.5% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.9% | 68.5% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 69.1% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 69.1% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.4% | 68.7% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.5% | 65.2% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 81.8% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 80.5% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.7% | 77% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 67% | 73.9% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.9% | 70.6% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.8% | 69.3% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.6% | 73.5% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.7% | 69.3% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 77.8% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 34.3% | 46.6% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 45.2% | 54.3% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 52% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 46.3% | 51.4% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 42.1% | 52.3% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 44.5% | 52.4% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 48.3% | 48.7% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 44.3% | 53.1% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 47.0% | 53.1% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 41.8% | 57% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.4% | 63.1% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.6% | 55.8% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.6% | 62.9% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 58.9% | 63.7% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.1% | 65.8% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 62% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.7% | 63.1% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.7% | 67.9% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.8% | 72.2% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 81.6% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.7% | 82.1% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 65.6% | 74.5% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.4% | 84.3% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 76.8% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.4% | 81.3% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.2% | 75.5% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.1% | 75.0% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 75.8% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.1% | 76.7% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.3% | 75.4% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 72.5% | 76.8% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 81.6% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 74.8% | 79.6% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 77.5% | 82.4% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85% | 86.2% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 86% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 86.3% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 82.4% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 86.2% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 86.3% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 88.1% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 61.7% | 67.3% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 69% | 68.7% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 66.5% | 66.2% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 60.4% | 64.4% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 65.8% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 66.1% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 61.2% | 67.4% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 74.4% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 73.6% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 78% | 74.4% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 73% | 74.1% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 77.5% | 75.4% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 74.2% | 71.9% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 76.0% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 89.2% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 88.8% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 88.9% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 86% | 88.4% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 89.4% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 86.3% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.3% | 86.5% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Timken High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.