Tecumseh High School
9830 West National Rd
New Carlisle OH, 45344, Clark County
Phone: 937-845-4500
Ranking:
(557 out of 821, bottom 32%)*

Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Tecumseh Local School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 54 | 52 | 53 | 56 | 60 | 59 | 57 | |||||||
Total Students: | 927 | 934 | 957 | 976 | 1,032 | 1,124 | 1,140 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 280 | 30.2% | 298 | 31.9% | 311 | 32.5% | 290 | 29.7% | 280 | 27.1% | 325 | 28.9% | 276 | 24.2% |
Grade 10: | 268 | 28.9% | 287 | 30.7% | 259 | 27.1% | 255 | 26.1% | 309 | 29.9% | 247 | 22.0% | 383 | 33.6% |
Grade 11: | 200 | 21.6% | 163 | 17.5% | 163 | 17.0% | 208 | 21.3% | 190 | 18.4% | 281 | 25.0% | 234 | 20.5% |
Grade 12: | 179 | 19.3% | 186 | 19.9% | 224 | 23.4% | 223 | 22.8% | 253 | 24.5% | 271 | 24.1% | 247 | 21.7% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 484 | 52.2% | 530 | 56.7% | 527 | 55.1% | 527 | 54.0% | 517 | 50.1% | 539 | 48.0% | 558 | 48.9% |
Female: | 443 | 47.8% | 404 | 43.3% | 430 | 44.9% | 449 | 46.0% | 486 | 47.1% | 560 | 49.8% | 563 | 49.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 5 | 0.5% | 4 | 0.4% | 4 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.2% | 5 | 0.5% | 6 | 0.5% | 2 | 0.2% |
Hispanic: | 89 | 9.6% | 81 | 8.7% | 72 | 7.5% | 74 | 7.6% | 67 | 6.5% | 67 | 6.0% | 65 | 5.7% |
Black: | 8 | 0.9% | 10 | 1.1% | 12 | 1.3% | 8 | 0.8% | 13 | 1.3% | 11 | 1.0% | 8 | 0.7% |
White: | 800 | 86.3% | 806 | 86.3% | 838 | 87.6% | 849 | 87.0% | 924 | 89.5% | 1,021 | 90.8% | 1,048 | 91.9% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 23 | 2.5% | 31 | 3.3% | 29 | 3.0% | 41 | 4.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 435 | 46.9% | 344 | 36.8% | 417 | 43.6% | 409 | 41.9% | 367 | 35.6% | 353 | 31.4% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 71 | 7.7% | 68 | 7.3% | 65 | 6.8% | 59 | 6.0% | 79 | 7.7% | 90 | 8.0% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 17.02 | 17.90 | 18.00 | 17.51 | 17.27 | 19.20 | 20.00 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 69.4% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 80.8% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.8% | 85.8% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 81.3% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 80.4% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 80.2% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 83.1% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 89.5% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 87.2% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 88.1% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82.8% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91% | 90.6% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.6% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 83.1% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.2% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.8% | 84.8% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 87.8% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 84.2% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 88.9% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 72% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.2% | 77.2% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.5% | 67.5% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.7% | 77.7% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.1% | 76.1% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.6% | 73.6% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.2% | 77.2% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 82.2% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 81.8% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 80.8% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 83.8% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.8% | 75.8% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 82.1% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 82.6% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 83.8% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 86.7% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 90.7% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 83.3% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 87.2% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 87.2% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 88.8% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 87.9% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 84.5% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 88.2% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 85.5% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.3% | 84.4% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 91.4% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 88.5% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 90.7% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 89.7% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 89.8% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 95.5% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.0% | 92.0% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.9% | 91.9% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 92.6% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 92.5% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 92.1% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 93.8% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.0% | 93.0% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.0% | 93.0% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 88.8% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 87.2% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 89.3% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 85.9% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 89.3% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 92.5% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.0% | 91.0% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 89.8% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 87.7% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 90.9% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 90.2% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 94.5% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.0% | 93.0% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 92.4% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 92.6% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 93.3% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 92.1% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 93.8% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 95.5% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.6% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Tecumseh High School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.