USA.com / Maryland / Pikesville, MD / 21208 / Public Schools / Shady Spring Elementary Primary School
Shady Spring Elementary Primary School
8868 Goldenwood Rd Rosedale MD, 21237, Baltimore County Phone: 410-887-0509 Ranking: (657 out of 1,074, bottom 39%)* Type: Regular Primary School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Prekindergarten to Grade 5 School District: Baltimore County Public Schools Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 39 | 40 | 38 | 38 | 39 | 41 | 41 | |||||||
Total Students: | 629 | 608 | 627 | 618 | 580 | 584 | 573 | |||||||
Prekindergarten: | 43 | 6.8% | 40 | 6.6% | 43 | 6.9% | 42 | 6.8% | 45 | 7.8% | 40 | 6.8% | 44 | 7.7% |
Kindergarten: | 98 | 15.6% | 97 | 16.0% | 117 | 18.7% | 107 | 17.3% | 97 | 16.7% | 98 | 16.8% | 81 | 14.1% |
Grade 1: | 110 | 17.5% | 103 | 16.9% | 114 | 18.2% | 101 | 16.3% | 90 | 15.5% | 84 | 14.4% | 74 | 12.9% |
Grade 2: | 103 | 16.4% | 103 | 16.9% | 95 | 15.2% | 95 | 15.4% | 84 | 14.5% | 75 | 12.8% | 103 | 18.0% |
Grade 3: | 100 | 15.9% | 88 | 14.5% | 85 | 13.6% | 86 | 13.9% | 77 | 13.3% | 99 | 17.0% | 84 | 14.7% |
Grade 4: | 90 | 14.3% | 93 | 15.3% | 94 | 15.0% | 78 | 12.6% | 98 | 16.9% | 83 | 14.2% | 96 | 16.8% |
Grade 5: | 85 | 13.5% | 84 | 13.8% | 79 | 12.6% | 109 | 17.6% | 89 | 15.3% | 105 | 18.0% | 91 | 15.9% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 322 | 51.2% | 305 | 50.2% | 291 | 46.4% | 286 | 46.3% | 271 | 46.7% | 276 | 47.3% | 283 | 49.4% |
Female: | 307 | 48.8% | 303 | 49.8% | 336 | 53.6% | 332 | 53.7% | 301 | 51.9% | 300 | 51.4% | 286 | 49.9% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 4 | 0.6% | 4 | 0.7% | 1 | 0.2% | 5 | 0.8% | 7 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 51 | 8.1% | 49 | 8.1% | 52 | 8.3% | 52 | 8.4% | 49 | 8.4% | 56 | 9.6% | 61 | 10.6% |
Hispanic: | 94 | 14.9% | 79 | 13.0% | 73 | 11.6% | 62 | 10.0% | 67 | 11.6% | 74 | 12.7% | 64 | 11.2% |
Black: | 381 | 60.6% | 371 | 61.0% | 373 | 59.5% | 357 | 57.8% | 365 | 62.9% | 346 | 59.2% | 350 | 61.1% |
White: | 72 | 11.4% | 79 | 13.0% | 98 | 15.6% | 106 | 17.2% | 92 | 15.9% | 108 | 18.5% | 97 | 16.9% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 26 | 4.1% | 25 | 4.1% | 30 | 4.8% | 36 | 5.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 422 | 67.1% | 390 | 64.1% | 388 | 61.9% | 362 | 58.6% | 284 | 49.0% | 304 | 52.1% | 279 | 48.7% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 56 | 8.9% | 79 | 13.0% | 75 | 12.0% | 73 | 11.8% | 99 | 17.1% | 85 | 14.6% | 77 | 13.4% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.21 | 15.20 | 16.33 | 16.35 | 14.72 | 14.30 | 14.10 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MSA | ||||||
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 67.9% | 73.1% | 72.2% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 78.2% | 76.8% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.3% | 77.6% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 81.4% | 78.6% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 83.2% | 82.6% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 85.7% | 84.3% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80% | 87.2% | 86.0% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 89.1% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 91.4% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 87.2% | 82.2% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 58.9% | 76.2% | 71.0% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 73.6% | 81.4% | 75.8% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 81.8% | 78.3% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76.4% | 83.4% | 80.5% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.9% | 85.0% | 83.0% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 87.5% | 84.9% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76.0% | 86.7% | 84.0% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 87.9% | 85.1% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.3% | 88.3% | 85.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.3% | 85.6% | 82.6% |
2004 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 72.0% | 69.6% |
2005 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 60.3% | 77.2% | 76.5% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 84.4% | 82.1% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 88.0% | 86% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 90.0% | 88.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 90.1% | 89.2% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 91.9% | 90.2% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 93% | 90.3% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 92.8% | 89.8% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.0% | 92.7% | 88.8% |
2004 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 67.1% | 80.7% | 75.1% |
2005 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 86.1% | 81.0% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.8% | 86.0% | 81.8% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 87.6% | 86.0% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 88.9% | 88.4% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.0% | 86.9% | 86.7% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 88.9% | 87.4% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.8% | 91.0% | 88.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 92.6% | 89.8% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 91.6% | 88.2% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 48.9% | 61.6% | 63.1% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 70.0% | 69.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 72.3% | 73.4% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 79.3% | 78.3% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 80.2% | 80.5% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.2% | 80.8% | 81.2% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 84.2% | 83.2% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 84.4% | 82.2% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 88.1% | 85.3% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 84.0% | 80.8% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 68.2% | 72.9% | 68.4% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 78.6% | 74.3% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 79.4% | 76.6% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 78.4% | 76.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 87.1% | 86.7% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 90.3% | 89.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 90.4% | 89.4% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 92.2% | 90.2% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 91.4% | 90.0% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 91.3% | 88.4% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Shady Spring Elementary Primary School was rated 2.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.