Oak Mt Intermediate School
5486 Caldwell Mill Rd Birmingham AL, 35242, Shelby County Phone: 205-682-5220 Ranking:  (98 out of 1,064, top 9%)*Type: Regular Middle School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 4 to Grade 5 School District: Shelby County School District Title I Eligible School: No Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
| 2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
| Total Teachers: | 40 | 40 | 37 | 42 | 42 | 43 | 44 | |||||||
| Total Students: | 771 | 715 | 707 | 762 | 768 | 763 | 787 | |||||||
| Grade 4: | 380 | 49.3% | 368 | 51.5% | 337 | 47.7% | 363 | 47.6% | 389 | 50.7% | 374 | 49.0% | 393 | 49.9% |
| Grade 5: | 391 | 50.7% | 347 | 48.5% | 370 | 52.3% | 399 | 52.4% | 379 | 49.3% | 389 | 51.0% | 394 | 50.1% |
| Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
| Male: | 400 | 51.9% | 377 | 52.7% | 387 | 54.7% | 395 | 51.8% | 399 | 52.0% | 386 | 50.6% | 393 | 49.9% |
| Female: | 371 | 48.1% | 338 | 47.3% | 320 | 45.3% | 367 | 48.2% | 360 | 46.9% | 369 | 48.4% | 390 | 49.6% |
| Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaska Native: | 3 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% |
| Asian: | 51 | 6.6% | 41 | 5.7% | 29 | 4.1% | 34 | 4.5% | 37 | 4.8% | 33 | 4.3% | 30 | 3.8% |
| Hispanic: | 53 | 6.9% | 48 | 6.7% | 58 | 8.2% | 51 | 6.7% | 38 | 4.9% | 30 | 3.9% | 27 | 3.4% |
| Black: | 70 | 9.1% | 69 | 9.7% | 69 | 9.8% | 69 | 9.1% | 52 | 6.8% | 58 | 7.6% | 55 | 7.0% |
| White: | 583 | 75.6% | 547 | 76.5% | 548 | 77.5% | 607 | 79.7% | 639 | 83.2% | 641 | 84.0% | 674 | 85.6% |
| Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 2 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Two or More Races: | 9 | 1.2% | 8 | 1.1% | 3 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
| Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 111 | 14.4% | 116 | 16.2% | 117 | 16.5% | 106 | 13.9% | 85 | 11.1% | 52 | 6.8% | 57 | 7.2% |
| Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 25 | 3.2% | 29 | 4.1% | 19 | 2.7% | 18 | 2.4% | 22 | 2.9% | 19 | 2.5% | 18 | 2.3% |
| Student-Teacher Ratio: | 19.08 | 18.01 | 19.26 | 18.32 | 18.29 | 17.60 | 18.00 | |||||||
Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
| ADAW | ||||||
| 2004 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 67.3% | 50.6% |
| 2005 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 57.9% | 42.2% |
| 2006 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 57.7% | 45% |
| 2008 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 59.73% | 41.11% | 37.08% |
| 2009 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.02% | 48.79% | 37.25% |
| 2004 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.5% | 68.2% | 57.3% |
| 2005 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 72.6% | 58.7% |
| 2006 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 71.3% | 64% |
| 2008 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.16% | 67.86% | 62.46% |
| 2009 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.38% | 70.63% | 64.88% |
| 2004 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 63.4% | 48.9% |
| 2005 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 68.3% | 57% | 44.4% |
| 2006 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.1% | 58% | 48.1% |
| 2008 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.7% | 47.98% | 43.41% |
| 2009 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.86% | 50.48% | 43.74% |
| 2004 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 62% | 47% |
| 2005 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.8% | 55.4% | 42.6% |
| 2006 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 57.1% | 48.1% |
| 2008 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.35% | 47.62% | 39.83% |
| 2009 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.75% | 50.74% | 40.59% |
| ARMT | ||||||
| 2004 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 77% | 71.9% |
| 2005 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 78.6% | 74% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 77.9% | 77.9% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.72% | 81.91% | 78.31% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.87% | 79.31% | 78.93% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.67% | 79.85% | 79.12% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.72% | 85.74% | 81.26% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.68% | 87.87% | 82.42% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 91.04% | 85.24% |
| 2004 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 85.4% | 76.9% |
| 2005 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 88.7% | 83.3% |
| 2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 87.7% | 84.4% |
| 2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 90.59% | 85.01% |
| 2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.61% | 91.87% | 86.09% |
| 2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.47% | 89.97% | 86.5% |
| 2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.85% | 90.39% | 86.69% |
| 2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.75% | 92.46% | 87.93% |
| 2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.46% | 90.3% | 88.16% |
| 2005 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 80.7% | 71.8% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 81.5% | 76.5% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.73% | 79.13% | 77.26% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.41% | 80.69% | 77.97% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.45% | 84.67% | 79.94% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 85.43% | 82.61% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.44% | 94.44% | 88.95% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.86% | 95.04% | 91.32% |
| 2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 86.7% | 80.9% |
| 2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 87% | 80.7% |
| 2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.97% | 88.11% | 84.6% |
| 2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.16% | 87.72% | 84.37% |
| 2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.57% | 89.09% | 84.65% |
| 2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.39% | 88.12% | 85.64% |
| 2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 96.15% | 92.93% | 88.59% |
| 2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 91.01% | 88.88% |
| ASA | ||||||
| 2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.79% | 78.88% | 69.84% |
| 2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.17% | 81.28% | 73.2% |
| 2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.64% | 80.89% | 77.35% |
| 2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 84.19% | 78.77% |
| 2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.64% | 83.53% | 80.09% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Oak Mt Intermediate School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.