USA.com / Minnesota / Public Schools / New Ulm High School / Test Performance

New Ulm High School, Test Performance

Basic InfoStudents and TeachersTest PerformanceTeacher's ExperienceSchool District

Year	Test	Grade	Measurement	Score	School District	State Average
MCA-II
2004	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	82.8%	82.8%	N/A
2005	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	83.8%	83.8%	N/A
2006	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	66.8%	66.8%	N/A
2007	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	62.4%	62.4%	N/A
2008	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	80.9%	80.9%	N/A
2009	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	83.2%	83.2%	N/A
2010	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	85.1%	85.1%	75.3%
2011	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	79.4%	79.4%	75.3%
2012	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	75.3%	75.3%	76.8%
2004	Mathematics	11th Grade	% met std	66.4%	66.4%	N/A
2005	Mathematics	11th Grade	% met std	73%	73%	N/A
2006	Mathematics	11th Grade	% met std	31.6%	31.6%	N/A
2007	Mathematics	11th Grade	% met std	27.7%	27.7%	N/A
2008	Mathematics	11th Grade	% met std	33.3%	33.3%	N/A
2009	Mathematics	11th Grade	% met std	38%	38%	N/A
2010	Mathematics	11th Grade	% met std	40.8%	40.8%	43.2%
2011	Mathematics	11th Grade	% met std	52.2%	52.2%	48.6%
2012	Mathematics	11th Grade	% met std	45.9%	45.9%	42.5%
2013	Mathematics	11th Grade	% met std	60.2%	60.2%	52.4%
2008	Mathematics	7th Grade	% met std	65.5%	65.5%	N/A
2009	Mathematics	7th Grade	% met std	53.1%	53.1%	N/A
2010	Mathematics	7th Grade	% met std	64.7%	64.7%	64.4%
2008	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	65.5%	65.5%	N/A
2009	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	58.8%	58.8%	N/A
2010	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	61.6%	61.6%	66.1%
2011	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	60.3%	60.3%	69.6%
2012	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	70.1%	70.1%	71.4%
2008	Mathematics	8th Grade	% met std	57.6%	57.6%	N/A
2009	Mathematics	8th Grade	% met std	44.9%	44.9%	N/A
2010	Mathematics	8th Grade	% met std	39.5%	39.5%	58.5%
2008	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	66.5%	66.5%	N/A
2009	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	61.6%	61.6%	N/A
2010	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	70.8%	70.8%	68.1%
2011	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	63.8%	63.8%	68.1%
2012	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	66.4%	66.4%	72.4%
2010	Science	8th Grade	% met std	62.9%	62.9%	47.9%
2011	Science	8th Grade	% met std	68.4%	68.4%	44.4%
2010	Science	End of course	% met std	59.4%	59.4%	51.8%
2011	Science	End of course	% met std	55.7%	55.7%	53.8%
MCA-II GRAD
2010	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	88.3%	88.3%	78.1%
2011	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	82.2%	82.2%	78.7%
2012	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	80.1%	80.1%	80.4%
2010	Math	11th Grade	% met std	65.3%	65.3%	57.8%
2011	Math	11th Grade	% met std	64.8%	64.8%	59.2%
2012	Math	11th Grade	% met std	60.6%	60.6%	57.7%
2013	Math	11th Grade	% met std	76.8%	76.8%	66.4%
2010	Writing	9th Grade	% met std	96.5%	96.5%	90.6%
2011	Writing	9th Grade	% met std	95.2%	95.2%	89.1%
2012	Writing	9th Grade	% met std	96.4%	96.4%	91.9%
2013	Writing	9th Grade	% met std	89.6%	89.6%	87.8%
MCA-III
2013	Reading	10th Grade	% met std	78.4%	78.4%	62.4%
2011	Math	7th Grade	% met std	52.2%	52.2%	51.7%
2012	Math	7th Grade	% met std	66.2%	66.2%	58.6%
2013	Math	7th Grade	% met std	61.4%	61.4%	56.1%
2013	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	52.6%	52.6%	54%
2011	Math	8th Grade	% met std	57%	57%	53.2%
2012	Math	8th Grade	% met std	60.2%	60.2%	62%
2013	Math	8th Grade	% met std	71.2%	71.2%	58.8%
2013	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	63.1%	63.1%	54.1%
2013	Science	8th Grade	% met std	68.1%	68.1%	43.8%
2013	Science	End of course	% met std	68.7%	68.7%	53%

Some data by SchoolDigger.com.

* New Ulm High School, Test Performance was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.