New Albany High School
7600 Fodor Rd
New Albany OH, 43054, Franklin County
Phone: 614-413-8300
Ranking: (40 out of 821, top 5%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: New Albany-Plain Local School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 105 | 99 | 100 | 91 | 82 | 76 | 66 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,326 | 1,245 | 1,200 | 1,175 | 1,128 | 1,134 | 1,088 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 372 | 28.1% | 323 | 25.9% | 314 | 26.2% | 317 | 27.0% | 296 | 26.2% | 279 | 24.6% | 305 | 28.0% |
Grade 10: | 315 | 23.8% | 312 | 25.1% | 325 | 27.1% | 295 | 25.1% | 266 | 23.6% | 313 | 27.6% | 289 | 26.6% |
Grade 11: | 319 | 24.1% | 321 | 25.8% | 293 | 24.4% | 256 | 21.8% | 295 | 26.2% | 290 | 25.6% | 247 | 22.7% |
Grade 12: | 320 | 24.1% | 289 | 23.2% | 268 | 22.3% | 307 | 26.1% | 271 | 24.0% | 252 | 22.2% | 247 | 22.7% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 689 | 52.0% | 648 | 52.0% | 636 | 53.0% | 610 | 51.9% | 567 | 50.3% | 572 | 50.4% | 544 | 50.0% |
Female: | 637 | 48.0% | 597 | 48.0% | 564 | 47.0% | 565 | 48.1% | 525 | 46.5% | 527 | 46.5% | 521 | 47.9% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.3% |
Asian: | 127 | 9.6% | 99 | 8.0% | 95 | 7.9% | 91 | 7.7% | 80 | 7.1% | 77 | 6.8% | 63 | 5.8% |
Hispanic: | 44 | 3.3% | 38 | 3.1% | 27 | 2.3% | 32 | 2.7% | 25 | 2.2% | 25 | 2.2% | 22 | 2.0% |
Black: | 104 | 7.8% | 95 | 7.6% | 99 | 8.3% | 86 | 7.3% | 92 | 8.2% | 93 | 8.2% | 84 | 7.7% |
White: | 996 | 75.1% | 963 | 77.3% | 941 | 78.4% | 935 | 79.6% | 901 | 79.9% | 909 | 80.2% | 897 | 82.4% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 52 | 3.9% | 49 | 3.9% | 38 | 3.2% | 30 | 2.6% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 168 | 12.7% | 152 | 12.2% | 165 | 13.8% | 139 | 11.8% | 76 | 6.7% | 118 | 10.4% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 53 | 4.0% | 45 | 3.6% | 39 | 3.3% | 44 | 3.7% | 28 | 2.5% | 43 | 3.8% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 12.69 | 12.64 | 12.02 | 12.97 | 13.79 | 14.90 | 16.60 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 91.7% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.2% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 95.7% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 92.6% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 87.4% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 95.8% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 96.6% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.2% | 98.2% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 97.8% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 96.1% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 94.7% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.2% | 98.2% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 99.1% | 99.1% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 99.6% | 99.6% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 95.7% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 95.8% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 96.9% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.2% | 98.2% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 97.8% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.4% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 88.1% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 92.6% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.6% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 86.6% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 90.5% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 89.7% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 93.7% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 96.8% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 94.5% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 96.1% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 91.7% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 92.8% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 94.4% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 94.6% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 96.8% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 97.8% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 96.1% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.1% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 99.1% | 99.1% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 96.8% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.4% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.3% | 97.3% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 98.9% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 99.4% | 99.4% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 96.7% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 97.8% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 96.7% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 96.8% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 97.1% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.8% | 98.8% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.0% | 99.0% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 98.5% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.1% | 99.1% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.3% | 98.3% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.6% | 98.6% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 98% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.2% | 99.2% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 100.0% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.7% | 99.7% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 95.4% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 95.4% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 94.8% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 96.5% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.6% | 98.6% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.8% | 98.8% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.7% | 98.7% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.5% | 97.5% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.5% | 97.5% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 96.1% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.1% | 98.1% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.3% | 98.3% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.8% | 98.8% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.6% | 99.6% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.7% | 98.7% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 99.3% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 99% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 100% | 100% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.7% | 99.7% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.4% | 99.4% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* New Albany High School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.