Luther Burbank Middle School
1 Hollywood Dr
Lancaster MA, 01523, Worcester County
Phone: 978-365-4558
Ranking: (345 out of 1,316, top 26%)*
Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 6 to Grade 8
School District: Nashoba School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 22 | 19 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 23 | 22 | |||||||
Total Students: | 242 | 250 | 249 | 257 | 247 | 239 | 222 | |||||||
Grade 6: | 78 | 32.2% | 79 | 31.6% | 84 | 33.7% | 88 | 34.2% | 82 | 33.2% | 90 | 37.7% | 65 | 29.3% |
Grade 7: | 85 | 35.1% | 80 | 32.0% | 85 | 34.1% | 79 | 30.7% | 86 | 34.8% | 75 | 31.4% | 72 | 32.4% |
Grade 8: | 79 | 32.6% | 91 | 36.4% | 80 | 32.1% | 90 | 35.0% | 79 | 32.0% | 74 | 31.0% | 85 | 38.3% |
Ungraded: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 134 | 55.4% | 146 | 58.4% | 129 | 51.8% | 135 | 52.5% | 126 | 51.0% | 137 | 57.3% | 116 | 52.3% |
Female: | 108 | 44.6% | 104 | 41.6% | 120 | 48.2% | 122 | 47.5% | 121 | 49.0% | 102 | 42.7% | 99 | 44.6% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.8% | 2 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.5% |
Asian: | 6 | 2.5% | 6 | 2.4% | 3 | 1.2% | 3 | 1.2% | 4 | 1.6% | 6 | 2.5% | 8 | 3.6% |
Hispanic: | 10 | 4.1% | 17 | 6.8% | 14 | 5.6% | 14 | 5.4% | 12 | 4.9% | 13 | 5.4% | 13 | 5.9% |
Black: | 5 | 2.1% | 4 | 1.6% | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.4% | 3 | 1.2% | 6 | 2.5% | 4 | 1.8% |
White: | 213 | 88.0% | 213 | 85.2% | 223 | 89.6% | 231 | 89.9% | 223 | 90.3% | 208 | 87.0% | 193 | 86.9% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 8 | 3.3% | 9 | 3.6% | 6 | 2.4% | 6 | 2.3% | 4 | 1.6% | 5 | 2.1% | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 32 | 13.2% | 30 | 12.0% | 42 | 16.9% | 45 | 17.5% | 41 | 16.6% | 33 | 13.8% | 22 | 9.9% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 9 | 3.7% | 4 | 1.6% | 3 | 1.2% | 8 | 3.1% | 10 | 4.0% | 7 | 2.9% | 5 | 2.3% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 10.96 | 13.30 | 12.43 | 12.63 | 12.20 | 10.60 | 9.90 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MCAS | ||||||
2006 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 80% | 84% | 64% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 89% | 67% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 74% | 85% | 67% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 69% | 79% | 66% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 86% | 69% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 81% | 89% | 68% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 85% | 66% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 80% | 84% | 67% |
2003 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 55.0% | 71.7% | 42% |
2004 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 75% | 42% |
2005 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 80% | 82% | 46% |
2006 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 60% | 73% | 46% |
2007 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 86% | 52% |
2008 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 82% | 56% |
2009 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 78% | 57% |
2010 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 76% | 59% |
2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 83% | 58% |
2012 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 79% | 60% |
2013 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 88% | 60% |
2003 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 86.8% | 90.2% | 66% |
2004 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 74% | 84% | 68% |
2005 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 80% | 87% | 66% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 83% | 65% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 88% | 69% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 89% | 69% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 77% | 87% | 70% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 77% | 87% | 72% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 89% | 73% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 86% | 89% | 71% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 78% | 86% | 71% |
2006 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 47% | 67% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 64% | 73% | 46% |
2008 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 79% | 75% | 47% |
2009 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 64% | 77% | 49% |
2010 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 76% | 53% |
2011 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 63% | 73% | 51% |
2012 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 77% | 78% | 51% |
2013 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 60% | 75% | 52% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 81% | 90% | 74% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 81% | 86% | 75% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 89% | 91% | 75% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 91% | 78% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 89% | 78% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 89% | 79% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 90% | 92% | 81% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 90% | 93% | 78% |
2003 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 51.9% | 62.8% | 37% |
2004 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 75% | 39% |
2005 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 74% | 39% |
2006 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 70% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 61% | 65% | 45% |
2008 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 73% | 49% |
2009 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 82% | 48% |
2010 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 74% | 80% | 51% |
2011 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 61% | 71% | 52% |
2012 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 73% | 52% |
2013 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 79% | 84% | 54% |
2003 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 45.1% | 52.5% | 32% |
2004 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 65% | 61% | 33% |
2005 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 55% | 58% | 33% |
2006 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 60% | 61% | 32% |
2007 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 51% | 59% | 33% |
2008 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 60% | 61% | 39% |
2009 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 61% | 39% |
2010 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 68% | 65% | 40% |
2011 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 57% | 54% | 39% |
2012 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 57% | 58% | 43% |
2013 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 50% | 59% | 39% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Luther Burbank Middle School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.