Lucile Erwin Middle School, Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
CSAP | ||||||
2004 | Math | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 70 | 61 | 53 |
2005 | Math | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 68 | 68 | 56 |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 61 | 61 | 56 |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 67 | 66 | 60 |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 68 | 64 | 61 |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 63 | 61 | 63 |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 68 | 65 | 62 |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 63 | 62 | 63 |
2004 | Reading | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 84 | 73 | 67 |
2005 | Reading | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 74 | 73 | 67 |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 76 | 75 | 69 |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 83 | 78 | 71 |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 82 | 76 | 71 |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 79 | 76 | 72 |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 86 | 78 | 72 |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 76 | 75 | 71 |
2004 | Writing | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 67 | 58 | 56 |
2005 | Writing | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 66 | 65 | 59 |
2006 | Writing | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 64 | 61 | 59 |
2007 | Writing | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 71 | 66 | 60 |
2008 | Writing | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 72 | 63 | 59 |
2009 | Writing | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 69 | 63 | 60 |
2010 | Writing | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 69 | 63 | 57 |
2011 | Writing | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 65 | 62 | 62 |
2004 | Math | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 56 | 50 | 42 |
2005 | Math | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 62 | 56 | 46 |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 59 | 54 | 44 |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 59 | 53 | 51 |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 56 | 53 | 46 |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 55 | 54 | 55 |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 52 | 52 | 49 |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 61 | 54 | 53 |
2004 | Reading | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 75 | 70 | 61 |
2005 | Reading | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 80 | 72 | 64 |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 72 | 69 | 64 |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 73 | 69 | 66 |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 74 | 70 | 65 |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 76 | 73 | 68 |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 74 | 69 | 68 |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 82 | 76 | 67 |
2004 | Writing | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 60 | 57 | 52 |
2005 | Writing | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 71 | 62 | 56 |
2006 | Writing | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 68 | 61 | 56 |
2007 | Writing | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 67 | 64 | 61 |
2008 | Writing | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 69 | 64 | 58 |
2009 | Writing | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 71 | 65 | 61 |
2010 | Writing | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 60 | 58 | 58 |
2011 | Writing | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 72 | 66 | 59 |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 52 | 47 | 41 |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 55 | 50 | 44 |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 60 | 54 | 45 |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 60 | 55 | 46 |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 53 | 52 | 47 |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 56 | 54 | 50 |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 56 | 53 | 51 |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 56 | 53 | 51 |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 72 | 70 | 64 |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 76 | 70 | 64 |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 80 | 71 | 66 |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 70 | 67 | 63 |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 72 | 70 | 67 |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 76 | 70 | 64 |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 69 | 68 | 68 |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 77 | 71 | 67 |
2004 | Science | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 65 | 58 | 51 |
2005 | Science | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 59 | 56 | 51 |
2006 | Science | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 67 | 57 | 51 |
2007 | Science | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 67 | 60 | 52 |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 49 | 51 | 46 |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 60 | 54 | 49 |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 54 | 52 | 48 |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 63 | 54 | 49 |
2004 | Writing | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 59 | 53 | 49 |
2005 | Writing | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 60 | 56 | 52 |
2006 | Writing | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 65 | 54 | 51 |
2007 | Writing | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 62 | 55 | 51 |
2008 | Writing | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 61 | 53 | 52 |
2009 | Writing | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 66 | 58 | 52 |
2010 | Writing | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 63 | 54 | 55 |
2011 | Writing | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 63 | 55 | 55 |
TCAP | ||||||
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 66.2 | 64.5 | 61.3 |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 65.3 | 62.3 | 62.0 |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 79.3 | 77.3 | 73.1 |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 77.6 | 76.5 | 72.9 |
2012 | Writing | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 60.3 | 57.6 | 56.1 |
2013 | Writing | 6th Grade | % Proficient | 58.5 | 57.7 | 57.6 |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 62.6 | 55.9 | 53.1 |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 55.2 | 55.5 | 55.0 |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 75.2 | 70.9 | 68.2 |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 74.7 | 69.1 | 67.5 |
2012 | Writing | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 65.0 | 59.4 | 61.8 |
2013 | Writing | 7th Grade | % Proficient | 57.0 | 59.9 | 61.3 |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 55.8 | 55.8 | 51.5 |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 55.4 | 50.0 | 51.5 |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 79.5 | 76.7 | 67.1 |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 77.3 | 70.7 | 66.9 |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 57.8 | 53.6 | 48.9 |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 57.8 | 52.7 | 51.7 |
2012 | Writing | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 65.9 | 49.5 | 54.8 |
2013 | Writing | 8th Grade | % Proficient | 59.2 | 52.3 | 55.8 |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Lucile Erwin Middle School, Test Performance was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.