Lee M. Thurston High School
26255 Schoolcraft
Redford MI, 48239, Wayne County
Phone: 313-242-0600
Ranking: (500 out of 665, bottom 25%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: South Redford School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 48 | 49 | 49 | 49 | 52 | 52 | 54 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,031 | 1,082 | 1,092 | 1,081 | 1,169 | 1,175 | 1,146 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 269 | 26.1% | 282 | 26.1% | 282 | 25.8% | 253 | 23.4% | 304 | 26.0% | 328 | 27.9% | 277 | 24.2% |
Grade 10: | 268 | 26.0% | 272 | 25.1% | 265 | 24.3% | 284 | 26.3% | 324 | 27.7% | 291 | 24.8% | 311 | 27.1% |
Grade 11: | 249 | 24.2% | 264 | 24.4% | 258 | 23.6% | 286 | 26.5% | 271 | 23.2% | 289 | 24.6% | 289 | 25.2% |
Grade 12: | 244 | 23.7% | 262 | 24.2% | 280 | 25.6% | 254 | 23.5% | 270 | 23.1% | 267 | 22.7% | 269 | 23.5% |
Ungraded: | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% | 7 | 0.6% | 4 | 0.4% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 536 | 52.0% | 556 | 51.4% | 565 | 51.7% | 540 | 50.0% | 586 | 50.1% | 602 | 51.2% | 581 | 50.7% |
Female: | 495 | 48.0% | 526 | 48.6% | 527 | 48.3% | 541 | 50.0% | 575 | 49.2% | 559 | 47.6% | 560 | 48.9% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 8 | 0.8% | 8 | 0.7% | 9 | 0.8% | 2 | 0.2% | 11 | 0.9% | 5 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 7 | 0.7% | 8 | 0.7% | 8 | 0.7% | 11 | 1.0% | 9 | 0.8% | 9 | 0.8% | 9 | 0.8% |
Hispanic: | 45 | 4.4% | 39 | 3.6% | 38 | 3.5% | 34 | 3.1% | 33 | 2.8% | 44 | 3.7% | 40 | 3.5% |
Black: | 694 | 67.3% | 713 | 65.9% | 668 | 61.2% | 659 | 61.0% | 687 | 58.8% | 656 | 55.8% | 593 | 51.7% |
White: | 242 | 23.5% | 277 | 25.6% | 334 | 30.6% | 355 | 32.8% | 429 | 36.7% | 455 | 38.7% | 501 | 43.7% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 35 | 3.4% | 37 | 3.4% | 35 | 3.2% | 20 | 1.9% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 503 | 48.8% | 513 | 47.4% | 451 | 41.3% | 478 | 44.2% | 451 | 38.6% | 381 | 32.4% | 313 | 27.3% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 81 | 7.9% | 99 | 9.1% | 89 | 8.2% | 67 | 6.2% | 99 | 8.5% | 105 | 8.9% | 102 | 8.9% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 21.30 | 21.90 | 22.17 | 22.11 | 22.66 | 22.70 | 21.10 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MEAP | ||||||
2006 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 53.5% | 53.5% | 52.4% |
2007 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 43.7% | 43.7% | 53.5% |
2006 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 74.5% | 74.5% | 70.1% |
2007 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 69.8% | 69.8% | 68% |
2006 | Science | 12th Grade | % met std | 62.2% | 62.2% | 56.8% |
2007 | Science | 12th Grade | % met std | 57.3% | 57.3% | 59.8% |
2006 | Writing | 12th Grade | % met std | 61.8% | 61.8% | 55.2% |
2007 | Writing | 12th Grade | % met std | 63.3% | 63.3% | 55.9% |
2010 | Social Studies | 9th Grade | % met std | 69.7% | 69.7% | 71.1% |
2011 | Social Studies | 9th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 66.7% | 72.8% |
2012 | Social Studies | 9th Grade | % met std | 14% | 14% | 28.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 9th Grade | % met std | 11.8% | 11.8% | 28.6% |
MME | ||||||
2007 | English Lang Arts | 11th Grade | % met std | 40.6% | 40.6% | 51% |
2008 | English Lang Arts | 11th Grade | % met std | 42.7% | 42.7% | 52.3% |
2009 | English Lang Arts | 11th Grade | % met std | 37.6% | 37.6% | 52.1% |
2007 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 33.1% | 33.1% | 46.5% |
2008 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 32% | 32% | 46.2% |
2009 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 36.2% | 36.2% | 49.3% |
2010 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 30.9% | 30.9% | 50.4% |
2011 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 41% | 41% | 52% |
2012 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 14.7% | 14.7% | 29.1% |
2013 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 13% | 13% | 29% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 51.4% | 51.4% | 59.7% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 53.3% | 53.3% | 61.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 50.4% | 50.4% | 59.9% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 51.8% | 51.8% | 65.2% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 52% | 52% | 63% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 50.6% | 50.6% | 55.9% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 42% | 42% | 54% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 43.8% | 43.8% | 55.9% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 46.4% | 46.4% | 56.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 46.3% | 46.3% | 55.6% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 50.2% | 50.2% | 57.9% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 53% | 53% | 61% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 15.9% | 15.9% | 25.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 12% | 12% | 26% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | 83.3% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 80.9% | 79.9% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | 81.3% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.5% | 79.5% | 79.4% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | 77% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 36.7% | 36.7% | 40.5% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 25% | 25% | 39% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 27.2% | 27.2% | 40.1% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 30.7% | 30.7% | 41.1% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 32.2% | 32.2% | 43.4% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 29.7% | 29.7% | 43.7% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 39% | 39% | 47% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 36.8% | 36.8% | 49.4% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 31% | 31% | 49% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Lee M. Thurston High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.