2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | NA | NA | 79 | 73 | 72 | 66 | 59 | 59 | ||||||
Total Students: | 1,516 | 1,544 | 1,510 | 1,488 | 1,390 | 1,210 | 1,065 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 401 | 26.5% | 381 | 24.7% | 383 | 25.4% | 356 | 23.9% | 387 | 27.8% | 327 | 27.0% | 340 | 31.9% |
Grade 10: | 363 | 23.9% | 391 | 25.3% | 367 | 24.3% | 393 | 26.4% | 348 | 25.0% | 356 | 29.4% | 284 | 26.7% |
Grade 11: | 371 | 24.5% | 371 | 24.0% | 406 | 26.9% | 336 | 22.6% | 351 | 25.3% | 276 | 22.8% | 212 | 19.9% |
Grade 12: | 381 | 25.1% | 401 | 26.0% | 354 | 23.4% | 403 | 27.1% | 304 | 21.9% | 251 | 20.7% | 229 | 21.5% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 809 | 53.4% | 815 | 52.8% | 815 | 54.0% | 792 | 53.2% | 671 | 48.3% | 581 | 48.0% | 513 | 48.2% |
Female: | 707 | 46.6% | 729 | 47.2% | 695 | 46.0% | 696 | 46.8% | 597 | 42.9% | 536 | 44.3% | 484 | 45.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 3 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% |
Asian: | 505 | 33.3% | 499 | 32.3% | 466 | 30.9% | 428 | 28.8% | 390 | 28.1% | 319 | 26.4% | 263 | 24.7% |
Hispanic: | 209 | 13.8% | 200 | 13.0% | 189 | 12.5% | 175 | 11.8% | 128 | 9.2% | 106 | 8.8% | 104 | 9.8% |
Black: | 45 | 3.0% | 47 | 3.0% | 41 | 2.7% | 54 | 3.6% | 48 | 3.5% | 39 | 3.2% | 40 | 3.8% |
White: | 633 | 41.8% | 682 | 44.2% | 685 | 45.4% | 757 | 50.9% | 707 | 50.9% | 659 | 54.5% | 593 | 55.7% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 122 | 8.0% | 115 | 7.4% | 127 | 8.4% | 72 | 4.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 213 | 14.1% | 272 | 17.6% | 245 | 16.2% | 264 | 17.7% | 258 | 18.6% | 169 | 14.0% | 168 | 15.8% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 64 | 4.2% | 111 | 7.2% | 107 | 7.1% | 117 | 7.9% | 90 | 6.5% | 79 | 6.5% | 72 | 6.8% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | NA | NA | 19.42 | 20.59 | 20.63 | 21.18 | 20.60 | 18.20 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
EOC | ||||||
2012 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 81.8% | 82.1% | N/A |
2013 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 93.8% | 94.4% | N/A |
2011 | Math Year 1 | End of course | % met std | 88.8% | 88.6% | N/A |
2012 | Math Year 1 | End of course | % met std | 87.8% | 89% | N/A |
2013 | Math Year 1 | End of course | % met std | 94.9% | 94.9% | N/A |
2011 | Math Year 2 | End of course | % met std | 74.7% | 86.6% | N/A |
2012 | Math Year 2 | End of course | % met std | 91.5% | 95% | N/A |
2013 | Math Year 2 | End of course | % met std | 96.0% | 96.8% | N/A |
HSPE | ||||||
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 67.6% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 90.1% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 90.3% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 90.5% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 94.7% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.2% | 71.4% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.1% | 71.2% | N/A |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 94.1% | N/A |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 92.8% | N/A |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 93.7% | N/A |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 94.4% | N/A |
WASL | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 48.5% | 65.7% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.3% | 72.1% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.4% | 69.3% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 70.1% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 73.1% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.9% | 82.5% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.1% | 87.1% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 91.2% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92% | 91.6% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 91.6% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 90.4% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 44.7% | 57.2% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.8% | 62.9% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 45.3% | 51.8% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.1% | 61.3% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 67.9% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 57% | 60.2% | N/A |
2004 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 81.4% | N/A |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.9% | 80.2% | N/A |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 89.2% | N/A |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 91% | N/A |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 94.6% | N/A |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.3% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Interlake Senior High School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.