Fairfield Local High School
11611 State Route 771 Leesburg OH, 45135, Highland County Phone: 937-780-2966 Ranking: ![]() Type: Regular High School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12 School District: Fairfield Local School District Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 16 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 14 | |||||||
Total Students: | 234 | 228 | 204 | 222 | 207 | 256 | 260 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 71 | 30.3% | 75 | 32.9% | 62 | 30.4% | 70 | 31.5% | 66 | 31.9% | 69 | 27.0% | 75 | 28.8% |
Grade 10: | 71 | 30.3% | 61 | 26.8% | 66 | 32.4% | 54 | 24.3% | 58 | 28.0% | 74 | 28.9% | 49 | 18.8% |
Grade 11: | 43 | 18.4% | 53 | 23.2% | 36 | 17.6% | 45 | 20.3% | 54 | 26.1% | 45 | 17.6% | 75 | 28.8% |
Grade 12: | 49 | 20.9% | 39 | 17.1% | 40 | 19.6% | 53 | 23.9% | 29 | 14.0% | 68 | 26.6% | 61 | 23.5% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 122 | 52.1% | 121 | 53.1% | 108 | 52.9% | 115 | 51.8% | 106 | 51.2% | 132 | 51.6% | 132 | 50.8% |
Female: | 112 | 47.9% | 107 | 46.9% | 96 | 47.1% | 107 | 48.2% | 92 | 44.4% | 116 | 45.3% | 123 | 47.3% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.8% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.4% |
Hispanic: | 1 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Black: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 2.0% | 1 | 0.4% |
White: | 225 | 96.2% | 218 | 95.6% | 197 | 96.6% | 218 | 98.2% | 205 | 99.0% | 249 | 97.3% | 257 | 98.8% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 7 | 3.0% | 7 | 3.1% | 4 | 2.0% | 1 | 0.5% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.63 | 15.20 | 13.25 | 13.88 | 13.80 | 17.10 | 18.60 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.3% | 68.3% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.5% | 76.5% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 88.1% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 83.3% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 90.5% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 94.2% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 94.2% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 92.3% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 94.6% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 88.3% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 89.7% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 88.1% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 97.6% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 89.9% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 96.2% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 92.3% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.2% | 98.2% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.5% | 73.5% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 82.1% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.6% | 73.6% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 88.1% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 84.1% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 96.2% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 84.6% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.1% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 77.8% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 95.7% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 87.7% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 85.3% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 88.1% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 88.9% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.2% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.6% | 98.6% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 85.5% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 96.2% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 90.8% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 89.3% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 96.8% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 97.8% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 100% | 100% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 96.6% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 97.9% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 93.8% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.2% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 100% | 100% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.4% | 98.4% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 93.2% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 95.8% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.4% | 98.4% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.9% | 91.9% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 87.1% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 97.8% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.4% | 98.4% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 88.1% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 97.9% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 92.2% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 96.8% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 85.7% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 100% | 100% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.4% | 98.4% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 91.5% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 93.8% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 96.9% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.2% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 100% | 100% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 100% | 100% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 93.2% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 97.9% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 96.9% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Fairfield Local High School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.