USA.com / Connecticut / New Haven County / Waterbury, CT / 06722 / Public Schools / F. J. Kingsbury School
F. J. Kingsbury School
220 Columbia Blvd
Waterbury CT, 06710, New Haven County
Phone: 203-574-8172
Ranking: (671 out of 765, bottom 12%)*
Type: Regular Primary School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Kindergarten to Grade 5
School District: Waterbury School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 30 | 31 | 33 | 32 | 32 | 34 | 29 | |||||||
Total Students: | 515 | 510 | 515 | 473 | 471 | 465 | 495 | |||||||
Kindergarten: | 77 | 15.0% | 87 | 17.1% | 81 | 15.7% | 77 | 16.3% | 80 | 17.0% | 79 | 17.0% | 82 | 16.6% |
Grade 1: | 94 | 18.3% | 88 | 17.3% | 91 | 17.7% | 79 | 16.7% | 74 | 15.7% | 72 | 15.5% | 75 | 15.2% |
Grade 2: | 81 | 15.7% | 82 | 16.1% | 83 | 16.1% | 88 | 18.6% | 84 | 17.8% | 68 | 14.6% | 84 | 17.0% |
Grade 3: | 93 | 18.1% | 89 | 17.5% | 94 | 18.3% | 71 | 15.0% | 79 | 16.8% | 81 | 17.4% | 94 | 19.0% |
Grade 4: | 84 | 16.3% | 85 | 16.7% | 80 | 15.5% | 82 | 17.3% | 72 | 15.3% | 84 | 18.1% | 76 | 15.4% |
Grade 5: | 86 | 16.7% | 79 | 15.5% | 86 | 16.7% | 76 | 16.1% | 82 | 17.4% | 81 | 17.4% | 83 | 16.8% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 248 | 48.2% | 263 | 51.6% | 278 | 54.0% | 234 | 49.5% | 232 | 49.3% | 239 | 51.4% | 248 | 50.1% |
Female: | 267 | 51.8% | 247 | 48.4% | 237 | 46.0% | 239 | 50.5% | 231 | 49.0% | 218 | 46.9% | 243 | 49.1% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 6 | 1.2% | 8 | 1.6% | 8 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 1.1% | 5 | 1.1% | 9 | 1.8% |
Hispanic: | 260 | 50.5% | 264 | 51.8% | 257 | 49.9% | 237 | 50.1% | 231 | 49.0% | 240 | 51.6% | 231 | 46.7% |
Black: | 160 | 31.1% | 149 | 29.2% | 166 | 32.2% | 150 | 31.7% | 157 | 33.3% | 147 | 31.6% | 172 | 34.7% |
White: | 72 | 14.0% | 80 | 15.7% | 79 | 15.3% | 74 | 15.6% | 77 | 16.3% | 73 | 15.7% | 83 | 16.8% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 17 | 3.3% | 8 | 1.6% | 4 | 0.8% | 11 | 2.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 431 | 83.7% | 397 | 77.8% | 400 | 77.7% | 362 | 76.5% | 381 | 80.9% | 327 | 70.3% | 345 | 69.7% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 42 | 8.2% | 47 | 9.2% | 36 | 7.0% | 48 | 10.1% | 43 | 9.1% | 64 | 13.8% | 58 | 11.7% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 17.17 | 16.45 | 15.61 | 14.78 | 14.72 | 15.80 | 17.10 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
CMT | ||||||
2006 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 63.8% | 78.3% |
2007 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 60.4% | 67.5% | 80.1% |
2008 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 61.2% | 70% | 80.7% |
2009 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.1% | 77.2% | 82.8% |
2010 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 62.7% | 74.4% | 83.6% |
2011 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.8% | 79.4% | 84.3% |
2012 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 75.5% | 85.8% |
2013 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 69.8% | 82.7% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 47.3% | 46.5% | 69.2% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 33% | 45.1% | 69.3% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 32.9% | 49.2% | 68.4% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 51.4% | 55% | 71.1% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 44.6% | 53.8% | 72.3% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 47.7% | 60.6% | 74% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 69.9% | 54.1% | 74.5% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 62.8% | 52.8% | 72.4% |
2006 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 73% | 81.7% |
2007 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 60.9% | 72.1% | 82.4% |
2008 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 51.2% | 72.1% | 82.9% |
2009 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.1% | 76.1% | 83.2% |
2010 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50.7% | 65.7% | 80.3% |
2011 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 60% | 72.4% | 81.1% |
2012 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 75.9% | 83.2% |
2013 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 65.9% | 65.5% | 80.4% |
2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 44.7% | 64.9% | 80.3% |
2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.6% | 66.7% | 80.9% |
2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 60.3% | 69.4% | 81.5% |
2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 61% | 74.5% | 84.6% |
2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 77.5% | 85.2% |
2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 69% | 79.2% | 85.2% |
2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 75.4% | 85.8% |
2013 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 69.9% | 83.8% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 39.5% | 49.4% | 71.8% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 33.7% | 45.3% | 70.6% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 33.8% | 47.4% | 69.7% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 37.3% | 53.1% | 74.4% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.8% | 52.2% | 72.9% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 58.6% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.1% | 61.2% | 78.3% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 64.1% | 59.4% | 77.6% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 76% | 84.2% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 61.7% | 73.1% | 84.1% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.2% | 74.6% | 84.8% |
2009 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 76.1% | 85% |
2010 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.9% | 77.4% | 86.5% |
2011 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 64.6% | 74.6% | 85.4% |
2012 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 65% | 72.2% | 83.7% |
2013 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 72.8% | 83.5% |
2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 41.3% | 64.8% | 80.8% |
2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.8% | 71.1% | 82.5% |
2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 64.2% | 73% | 83.1% |
2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.4% | 78.2% | 85.9% |
2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 82.6% | 87.8% |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 81.9% | 87.6% |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.6% | 69.5% | 85.7% |
2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 70.1% | 84.4% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 34.7% | 47.9% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 41.6% | 51.4% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 39.5% | 53.2% | 74% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 56.9% | 59.9% | 77.7% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 51.6% | 58.2% | 75.4% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 58.3% | 75.1% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 60% | 58.7% | 79.7% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 59.3% | 79.1% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 39.5% | 58.4% | 81.1% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.5% | 63.8% | 82.9% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 52.8% | 64.4% | 82.5% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.7% | 62% | 82.4% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 56.4% | 58.3% | 82.4% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 54.3% | 62.5% | 81.7% |
2006 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 56.2% | 74.2% | 85.3% |
2007 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 67.5% | 73.7% | 85.7% |
2008 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 60% | 70.3% | 85.7% |
2009 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 64% | 75.7% | 86.5% |
2010 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 75.7% | 87.3% |
2011 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 78.8% | 88% |
2012 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.8% | 78.7% | 88.5% |
2013 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 64.3% | 75.9% | 87.7% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* F. J. Kingsbury School was rated 1.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.