David R. Cawley Middle School
89 Whitehall Rd
Hooksett NH, 03106, Merrimack County
Phone: 603-518-5047
Ranking: (51 out of 355, top 14%)*
Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 6 to Grade 8
School District: Hooksett School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 40 | 41 | 40 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 40 | |||||||
Total Students: | 504 | 479 | 514 | 508 | 504 | 522 | 517 | |||||||
Grade 6: | 178 | 35.3% | 157 | 32.8% | 166 | 32.3% | 155 | 30.5% | 190 | 37.7% | 169 | 32.4% | 146 | 28.2% |
Grade 7: | 156 | 31.0% | 169 | 35.3% | 151 | 29.4% | 191 | 37.6% | 170 | 33.7% | 145 | 27.8% | 212 | 41.0% |
Grade 8: | 170 | 33.7% | 153 | 31.9% | 197 | 38.3% | 162 | 31.9% | 144 | 28.6% | 208 | 39.8% | 159 | 30.8% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 265 | 52.6% | 243 | 50.7% | 253 | 49.2% | 245 | 48.2% | 238 | 47.2% | 261 | 50.0% | 266 | 51.5% |
Female: | 239 | 47.4% | 236 | 49.3% | 261 | 50.8% | 263 | 51.8% | 266 | 52.8% | 253 | 48.5% | 247 | 47.8% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.6% | 5 | 1.0% | 5 | 1.0% | 5 | 1.0% |
Asian: | 8 | 1.6% | 10 | 2.1% | 11 | 2.1% | 11 | 2.2% | 14 | 2.8% | 10 | 1.9% | 10 | 1.9% |
Hispanic: | 23 | 4.6% | 18 | 3.8% | 24 | 4.7% | 21 | 4.1% | 14 | 2.8% | 8 | 1.5% | 8 | 1.5% |
Black: | 5 | 1.0% | 5 | 1.0% | 8 | 1.6% | 13 | 2.6% | 10 | 2.0% | 7 | 1.3% | 8 | 1.5% |
White: | 440 | 87.3% | 424 | 88.5% | 452 | 87.9% | 450 | 88.6% | 461 | 91.5% | 492 | 94.3% | 486 | 94.0% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 27 | 5.4% | 20 | 4.2% | 15 | 2.9% | 9 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 71 | 14.1% | 64 | 13.4% | 73 | 14.2% | 55 | 10.8% | 47 | 9.3% | 40 | 7.7% | 29 | 5.6% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 18 | 3.6% | 24 | 5.0% | 16 | 3.1% | 26 | 5.1% | 19 | 3.8% | 19 | 3.6% | 22 | 4.3% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 12.60 | 11.68 | 12.85 | 13.19 | 12.60 | 12.70 | 13.10 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
NECAP | ||||||
2006 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | 61% |
2007 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | 67% |
2008 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | 68% |
2009 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | 69% |
2010 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | 72% |
2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 71% |
2012 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 72% |
2013 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | 74% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 65% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 72% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | 73% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | 74% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 83% | 82% | 76% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 77% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 80% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 79% |
2006 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 64% | 64% | 59% |
2007 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 65% | 65% | 62% |
2008 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 67% | 67% | 63% |
2009 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% | 66% |
2010 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 67% | 67% | 66% |
2011 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 66% |
2012 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | 68% |
2013 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 69% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 66% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | 67% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 75% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 77% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | 72% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | 77% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 77% |
2006 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 61% | 61% | 56% |
2007 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 70% | 71% | 57% |
2008 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | 58% |
2009 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | 65% |
2010 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | 66% |
2011 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | 66% |
2012 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 82% | 81% | 68% |
2013 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | 68% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | 62% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | 66% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | 67% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 71% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 76% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 78% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 82% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 82% |
2006 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 66% | 66% | 49% |
2007 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 59% | 59% | 42% |
2008 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 44% | 44% | 43% |
2009 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 66% | 66% | 51% |
2011 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71% | 64% |
2012 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 68% | 67% | 61% |
2013 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 70% | 70% | 67% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* David R. Cawley Middle School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.