Claysburg-Kimmel High School
531 Bedford St Claysburg PA, 16625, Blair County Phone: 814-239-5141
Type: Regular High School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 7 to Grade 12 School District: Claysburg-Kimmel School District Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
(526 out of 626, bottom 16%)
(1,650 out of 2,311, bottom 29%)*Students and Teachers
| 2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
| Total Teachers: | 26 | 30 | 31 | 34 | 33 | 32 | 31 | |||||||
| Total Students: | 415 | 402 | 412 | 395 | 418 | 433 | 427 | |||||||
| Grade 7: | 79 | 19.0% | 55 | 13.7% | 74 | 18.0% | 64 | 16.2% | 63 | 15.1% | 78 | 18.0% | 63 | 14.8% |
| Grade 8: | 56 | 13.5% | 74 | 18.4% | 68 | 16.5% | 61 | 15.4% | 80 | 19.1% | 58 | 13.4% | 75 | 17.6% |
| Grade 9: | 71 | 17.1% | 66 | 16.4% | 62 | 15.0% | 74 | 18.7% | 56 | 13.4% | 73 | 16.9% | 76 | 17.8% |
| Grade 10: | 63 | 15.2% | 65 | 16.2% | 78 | 18.9% | 57 | 14.4% | 73 | 17.5% | 71 | 16.4% | 76 | 17.8% |
| Grade 11: | 65 | 15.7% | 81 | 20.1% | 61 | 14.8% | 71 | 18.0% | 69 | 16.5% | 79 | 18.2% | 73 | 17.1% |
| Grade 12: | 81 | 19.5% | 61 | 15.2% | 69 | 16.7% | 67 | 17.0% | 76 | 18.2% | 74 | 17.1% | 64 | 15.0% |
| Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
| Male: | 208 | 50.1% | 201 | 50.0% | 211 | 51.2% | 209 | 52.9% | 214 | 51.2% | 217 | 50.1% | 215 | 50.4% |
| Female: | 207 | 49.9% | 201 | 50.0% | 201 | 48.8% | 186 | 47.1% | 196 | 46.9% | 208 | 48.0% | 208 | 48.7% |
| Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Asian: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hispanic: | 1 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Black: | 6 | 1.4% | 7 | 1.7% | 7 | 1.7% | 3 | 0.8% | 3 | 0.7% | 3 | 0.7% | 4 | 0.9% |
| White: | 408 | 98.3% | 393 | 97.8% | 404 | 98.1% | 392 | 99.2% | 415 | 99.3% | 429 | 99.1% | 423 | 99.1% |
| Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Two or More Races: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
| Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 175 | 42.2% | 139 | 34.6% | 163 | 39.6% | 146 | 37.0% | 147 | 35.2% | 164 | 37.9% | 119 | 27.9% |
| Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 37 | 8.9% | 34 | 8.5% | 69 | 16.7% | 70 | 17.7% | 72 | 17.2% | 67 | 15.5% | 61 | 14.3% |
| Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.90 | 13.40 | 13.29 | 11.79 | 12.86 | 13.40 | 13.80 | |||||||
Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
| PSSA | ||||||
| 2003 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 41.4% | 41.4% | 49.1% |
| 2004 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 36.8% | 36.8% | 49.1% |
| 2005 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 42.5% | 42.5% | 50.9% |
| 2006 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 30% | 29.6% | 52% |
| 2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 31.6% | 31.6% | 53.7% |
| 2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 46.5% | 45.9% | 55.9% |
| 2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 50% | 50% | 55.6% |
| 2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 49.2% | 49.2% | 59.6% |
| 2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 41.7% | 41.7% | 60.3% |
| 2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 38.5% | 38.5% | 60% |
| 2003 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 65.5% | 65.5% | 59.2% |
| 2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 48.5% | 48.5% | 60.8% |
| 2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 57.5% | 57.5% | 65% |
| 2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 44.3% | 43.6% | 65.1% |
| 2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 53.3% | 53.3% | 65.4% |
| 2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 63.3% | 62.5% | 64.7% |
| 2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 67.1% | 67.1% | 65.2% |
| 2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 66.1% | 66.1% | 67.2% |
| 2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 58.7% | 58.7% | 69.1% |
| 2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 49.1% | 49.1% | 67.8% |
| 2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 23.1% | 22.9% | 35.7% |
| 2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 25.3% | 25% | 39.7% |
| 2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 9.2% | 9.2% | 39.8% |
| 2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 19.1% | 19.1% | 40.8% |
| 2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 26.4% | 26.4% | 41.8% |
| 2005 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.6% | 64.6% | 69% |
| 2006 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 64.7% | 85.6% |
| 2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | 87.9% |
| 2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 94.3% | 85.8% |
| 2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 77.3% | 82.7% |
| 2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 56.9% | 56.9% | 80.7% |
| 2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 84.7% |
| 2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.9% | 64.9% | 82.9% |
| 2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.9% | 76.8% | 66.5% |
| 2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 66.2% | 65.3% | 67.2% |
| 2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 57.4% | 58.1% | 70.6% |
| 2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.3% | 79.3% | 75.3% |
| 2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 64% | 64% | 77.9% |
| 2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 69.4% | 78.6% |
| 2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 85.5% | 80.1% |
| 2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.8% | 60.8% | 68.1% |
| 2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 63.4% | 62.5% | 66.8% |
| 2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 50% | 49.2% | 70% |
| 2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 79.3% | 71.4% |
| 2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.3% | 61.3% | 73.5% |
| 2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 87.7% | 76% |
| 2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 79.4% | 76% |
| 2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 34.8% | 34.8% | 51.3% |
| 2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 66.6% | 57.9% |
| 2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 59.8% | 59.8% | 62.9% |
| 2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 65.8% | 65.8% | 62.2% |
| 2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 64.3% | 64.8% | 67.9% |
| 2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.8% | 54.6% | 70.4% |
| 2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 68.4% | 71.3% |
| 2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 66.6% | 75.2% |
| 2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 74.5% | 74.5% | 76.9% |
| 2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 68.3% | 68.3% | 76.4% |
| 2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 58% | 58% | 63.4% |
| 2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 77.7% | 68.9% |
| 2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | 64.1% |
| 2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 73.1% | 70.6% |
| 2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.7% | 75.6% | 75% |
| 2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 76.7% | 78.3% |
| 2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.1% | 66.7% | 80.5% |
| 2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 77.6% | 81.9% |
| 2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 85.4% | 81.8% |
| 2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 76.2% | 79.8% |
| 2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 50.7% | 48.6% | 52.7% |
| 2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 42.4% | 42.4% | 54.8% |
| 2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 50% | 50% | 57.2% |
| 2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 35.7% | 35.7% | 58.3% |
| 2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 61.9% | 61.9% | 59.7% |
| 2006 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.9% | 54.9% | 66.1% |
| 2007 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 70.4% | 71.8% |
| 2008 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.1% | 68% | 69.1% |
| 2009 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 56.1% | 56.1% | 71.2% |
| 2010 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 57% | 57% | 75.2% |
| 2011 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 45.8% | 45.8% | 73.1% |
| 2012 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 60.3% | 60.3% | 72.7% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Claysburg-Kimmel High School was rated 2 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.