USA.com / Maryland / Baltimore County Public Schools / Church Lane Elementary Technology Primary School
Church Lane Elementary Technology Primary School
3820 Fernside Rd Randallstown MD, 21133, Baltimore County Phone: 410-887-0717 Ranking: (319 out of 1,074, top 30%)* Type: Regular Primary School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Prekindergarten to Grade 5 School District: Baltimore County Public Schools Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 32 | 31 | 33 | 34 | 32 | 33 | 31 | |||||||
Total Students: | 501 | 503 | 489 | 497 | 478 | 463 | 492 | |||||||
Prekindergarten: | 20 | 4.0% | 19 | 3.8% | 20 | 4.1% | 20 | 4.0% | 19 | 4.0% | 20 | 4.3% | 22 | 4.5% |
Kindergarten: | 60 | 12.0% | 72 | 14.3% | 64 | 13.1% | 65 | 13.1% | 55 | 11.5% | 53 | 11.4% | 68 | 13.8% |
Grade 1: | 89 | 17.8% | 77 | 15.3% | 79 | 16.2% | 75 | 15.1% | 72 | 15.1% | 65 | 14.0% | 60 | 12.2% |
Grade 2: | 76 | 15.2% | 82 | 16.3% | 83 | 17.0% | 80 | 16.1% | 76 | 15.9% | 76 | 16.4% | 83 | 16.9% |
Grade 3: | 87 | 17.4% | 84 | 16.7% | 79 | 16.2% | 85 | 17.1% | 81 | 16.9% | 86 | 18.6% | 80 | 16.3% |
Grade 4: | 83 | 16.6% | 76 | 15.1% | 86 | 17.6% | 80 | 16.1% | 90 | 18.8% | 77 | 16.6% | 88 | 17.9% |
Grade 5: | 86 | 17.2% | 93 | 18.5% | 78 | 16.0% | 92 | 18.5% | 85 | 17.8% | 86 | 18.6% | 91 | 18.5% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 261 | 52.1% | 270 | 53.7% | 269 | 55.0% | 287 | 57.7% | 263 | 55.0% | 253 | 54.6% | 262 | 53.3% |
Female: | 240 | 47.9% | 233 | 46.3% | 220 | 45.0% | 210 | 42.3% | 207 | 43.3% | 202 | 43.6% | 226 | 45.9% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 17 | 3.4% | 15 | 3.0% | 16 | 3.3% | 19 | 3.8% | 20 | 4.2% | 24 | 5.2% | 24 | 4.9% |
Hispanic: | 31 | 6.2% | 24 | 4.8% | 24 | 4.9% | 18 | 3.6% | 11 | 2.3% | 13 | 2.8% | 17 | 3.5% |
Black: | 438 | 87.4% | 445 | 88.5% | 434 | 88.8% | 443 | 89.1% | 437 | 91.4% | 414 | 89.4% | 435 | 88.4% |
White: | 4 | 0.8% | 8 | 1.6% | 4 | 0.8% | 6 | 1.2% | 9 | 1.9% | 11 | 2.4% | 15 | 3.0% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 3 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 7 | 1.4% | 7 | 1.4% | 8 | 1.6% | 9 | 1.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 271 | 54.1% | 270 | 53.7% | 246 | 50.3% | 215 | 43.3% | 191 | 40.0% | 172 | 37.1% | 200 | 40.7% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 58 | 11.6% | 61 | 12.1% | 45 | 9.2% | 58 | 11.7% | 72 | 15.1% | 63 | 13.6% | 54 | 11.0% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.66 | 16.07 | 14.82 | 14.75 | 14.75 | 14.00 | 15.90 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MSA | ||||||
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 73.1% | 72.2% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 78.2% | 76.8% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 77.6% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 81.4% | 78.6% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 83.2% | 82.6% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 85.7% | 84.3% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 87.2% | 86.0% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 89.1% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 91.4% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 87.2% | 82.2% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 76.2% | 71.0% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 81.4% | 75.8% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 81.8% | 78.3% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 83.4% | 80.5% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.5% | 85.0% | 83.0% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 87.5% | 84.9% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 86.7% | 84.0% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 87.9% | 85.1% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 88.3% | 85.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.0% | 85.6% | 82.6% |
2004 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 72.0% | 69.6% |
2005 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 77.2% | 76.5% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 84.4% | 82.1% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 88.0% | 86% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 90.0% | 88.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.1% | 90.1% | 89.2% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 91.9% | 90.2% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 93% | 90.3% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 92.8% | 89.8% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 92.7% | 88.8% |
2004 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.5% | 80.7% | 75.1% |
2005 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 86.1% | 81.0% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 86.0% | 81.8% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 87.6% | 86.0% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.0% | 88.9% | 88.4% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 86.9% | 86.7% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 88.9% | 87.4% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.5% | 91.0% | 88.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 92.6% | 89.8% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 91.6% | 88.2% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 56.8% | 61.6% | 63.1% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 70.0% | 69.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 72.3% | 73.4% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 79.3% | 78.3% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 80.2% | 80.5% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 80.8% | 81.2% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 84.2% | 83.2% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 84.4% | 82.2% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 96.0% | 88.1% | 85.3% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 84.0% | 80.8% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.7% | 72.9% | 68.4% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.0% | 78.6% | 74.3% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 79.4% | 76.6% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 78.4% | 76.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.9% | 87.1% | 86.7% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 90.3% | 89.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 90.4% | 89.4% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 92.2% | 90.2% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 91.4% | 90.0% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 91.3% | 88.4% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Church Lane Elementary Technology Primary School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.