Cedar Mill Elementary School
10265 Nw Cornell Rd Portland OR, 97229, Washington County Phone: 503-259-6685 Ranking:  (78 out of 958, top 8%)*Type: Regular Primary School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Kindergarten to Grade 5 School District: Beaverton School District 48J Title I Eligible School: No Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
| 2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
| Total Teachers: | 13 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 16 | 18 | 23 | |||||||
| Total Students: | 310 | 282 | 271 | 259 | 248 | 222 | 385 | |||||||
| Kindergarten: | 59 | 19.0% | 44 | 15.6% | 48 | 17.7% | 39 | 15.1% | 40 | 16.1% | 28 | 12.6% | 52 | 13.5% |
| Grade 1: | 51 | 16.5% | 53 | 18.8% | 46 | 17.0% | 46 | 17.8% | 43 | 17.3% | 37 | 16.7% | 67 | 17.4% |
| Grade 2: | 56 | 18.1% | 58 | 20.6% | 43 | 15.9% | 48 | 18.5% | 36 | 14.5% | 33 | 14.9% | 68 | 17.7% |
| Grade 3: | 59 | 19.0% | 38 | 13.5% | 47 | 17.3% | 42 | 16.2% | 39 | 15.7% | 40 | 18.0% | 65 | 16.9% |
| Grade 4: | 41 | 13.2% | 37 | 13.1% | 48 | 17.7% | 38 | 14.7% | 43 | 17.3% | 45 | 20.3% | 64 | 16.6% |
| Grade 5: | 44 | 14.2% | 52 | 18.4% | 39 | 14.4% | 46 | 17.8% | 47 | 19.0% | 39 | 17.6% | 69 | 17.9% |
| Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
| Male: | 158 | 51.0% | 150 | 53.2% | 146 | 53.9% | 132 | 51.0% | 111 | 44.8% | 91 | 41.0% | 180 | 46.8% |
| Female: | 152 | 49.0% | 132 | 46.8% | 125 | 46.1% | 127 | 49.0% | 107 | 43.1% | 100 | 45.0% | 173 | 44.9% |
| Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.5% | 4 | 1.0% |
| Asian: | 39 | 12.6% | 26 | 9.2% | 16 | 5.9% | 23 | 8.9% | 21 | 8.5% | 22 | 9.9% | 31 | 8.1% |
| Hispanic: | 24 | 7.7% | 24 | 8.5% | 28 | 10.3% | 27 | 10.4% | 33 | 13.3% | 25 | 11.3% | 35 | 9.1% |
| Black: | 7 | 2.3% | 9 | 3.2% | 7 | 2.6% | 4 | 1.5% | 4 | 1.6% | 1 | 0.5% | 7 | 1.8% |
| White: | 200 | 64.5% | 190 | 67.4% | 182 | 67.2% | 175 | 67.6% | 167 | 67.3% | 150 | 67.6% | 280 | 72.7% |
| Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Two or More Races: | 39 | 12.6% | 32 | 11.3% | 38 | 14.0% | 30 | 11.6% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
| Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 35 | 11.3% | 44 | 15.6% | 56 | 20.7% | 46 | 17.8% | 35 | 14.1% | 36 | 16.2% | 56 | 14.5% |
| Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 6 | 1.9% | 5 | 1.8% | 7 | 2.6% | 11 | 4.2% | 13 | 5.2% | 8 | 3.6% | 9 | 2.3% |
| Student-Teacher Ratio: | 23.19 | 20.89 | 19.18 | 16.71 | 15.96 | 12.70 | 16.70 | |||||||
Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
| OAKS | ||||||
| 2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 88.8% | 81.9% |
| 2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 90.9% | 86.1% |
| 2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91% | 91.3% | 86% |
| 2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85% | 79.8% | 70% |
| 2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82% | 85.2% | 77% |
| 2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 86.5% | 77% |
| 2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 86.6% | 76.5% |
| 2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 73% | 63% |
| 2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.6% | 75.6% | 64% |
| 2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 72.8% | 61% |
| 2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 87.9% | 83% |
| 2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 89.6% | 85.5% |
| 2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 91% | 87% |
| 2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95% | 87% | 83% |
| 2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.8% | 88.9% | 84% |
| 2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 88.1% | 83% |
| 2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 87.7% | 82.8% |
| 2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 87.3% | 83% |
| 2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 78% | 70% |
| 2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 72.7% | 66% |
| 2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 91.5% | 88% |
| 2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 76.1% | 72% |
| 2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 85.7% | 77% |
| 2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 84.5% | 77% |
| 2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 86.2% | 77.2% |
| 2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 75.7% | 65% |
| 2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 78.7% | 66% |
| 2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 75.4% | 64% |
| 2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 90% | 87% |
| 2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 81.8% | 80% |
| 2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 88.7% | 83% |
| 2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 86.9% | 84% |
| 2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 88.5% | 84.1% |
| 2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 88.3% | 85% |
| 2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 82.3% | 74% |
| 2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 77.4% | 73% |
| 2005 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 50% | 42.2% | 32.4% |
| 2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 70% | 61.5% | 42% |
| 2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 58% | 52.6% | 45% |
| 2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 63.8% | 63.2% | 43% |
| 2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 87.7% | 78.9% |
| 2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 90.4% | 84% |
| 2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 89.8% | 85% |
| 2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 76.8% | 68% |
| 2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 85.7% | 77% |
| 2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 85.1% | 77% |
| 2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 86.2% | 76.5% |
| 2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 72.7% | 58% |
| 2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 73.8% | 60% |
| 2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 69.7% | 58% |
| 2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 79.7% | 76.8% |
| 2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 87.4% | 81.4% |
| 2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 88.2% | 83% |
| 2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 77.4% | 72% |
| 2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 83.3% | 75% |
| 2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 83.4% | 76% |
| 2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 82.7% | 76.3% |
| 2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 83.8% | 78% |
| 2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 76.9% | 69% |
| 2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 74.2% | 68% |
| 2004 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 77.9% | 69.9% |
| 2005 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 75% | 83.1% | 75% |
| 2006 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 87.7% | 79% |
| 2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 83.9% | 75% |
| 2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 83.7% | 75% |
| 2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 81.6% | 74.4% |
| 2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.7% | 81.8% | 74% |
| 2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 78.3% | 69% |
| 2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.0% | 74.7% | 67% |
| 2004 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.9% | 49% | 33.2% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Cedar Mill Elementary School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.