Agawam Junior High Middle School
1305 Springfield St
Feeding Hills MA, 01030, Hampden County
Phone: 413-821-0561
Ranking: (673 out of 1,316, bottom 49%)*
Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 7 to Grade 8
School District: Agawam School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 61 | 58 | 56 | 58 | 60 | 64 | 62 | |||||||
Total Students: | 629 | 644 | 697 | 695 | 724 | 732 | 717 | |||||||
Grade 7: | 324 | 51.5% | 298 | 46.3% | 358 | 51.4% | 355 | 51.1% | 357 | 49.3% | 369 | 50.4% | 370 | 51.6% |
Grade 8: | 305 | 48.5% | 346 | 53.7% | 339 | 48.6% | 340 | 48.9% | 367 | 50.7% | 363 | 49.6% | 347 | 48.4% |
Ungraded: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 329 | 52.3% | 340 | 52.8% | 366 | 52.5% | 372 | 53.5% | 394 | 54.4% | 363 | 49.6% | 347 | 48.4% |
Female: | 300 | 47.7% | 304 | 47.2% | 331 | 47.5% | 323 | 46.5% | 330 | 45.6% | 369 | 50.4% | 364 | 50.8% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.4% | 3 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 13 | 2.1% | 15 | 2.3% | 12 | 1.7% | 12 | 1.7% | 12 | 1.7% | 8 | 1.1% | 6 | 0.8% |
Hispanic: | 33 | 5.2% | 27 | 4.2% | 30 | 4.3% | 30 | 4.3% | 25 | 3.5% | 17 | 2.3% | 2 | 0.3% |
Black: | 9 | 1.4% | 2 | 0.3% | 7 | 1.0% | 14 | 2.0% | 12 | 1.7% | 8 | 1.1% | 8 | 1.1% |
White: | 562 | 89.3% | 589 | 91.5% | 641 | 92.0% | 628 | 90.4% | 663 | 91.6% | 693 | 94.7% | 699 | 97.5% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 3 | 0.4% | 3 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 11 | 1.7% | 9 | 1.4% | 4 | 0.6% | 5 | 0.7% | 6 | 0.8% | 5 | 0.7% | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 201 | 32.0% | 151 | 23.4% | 165 | 23.7% | 150 | 21.6% | 134 | 18.5% | 125 | 17.1% | 118 | 16.5% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 28 | 4.5% | 38 | 5.9% | 33 | 4.7% | 45 | 6.5% | 36 | 5.0% | 38 | 5.2% | 41 | 5.7% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 10.25 | 11.02 | 12.51 | 11.95 | 12.12 | 11.50 | 11.60 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MCAS | ||||||
2003 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 76.2% | 73.9% | 66% |
2004 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 69% | 68% |
2005 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 74% | 73% | 66% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 65% | 63% | 65% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 77% | 75% | 69% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 77% | 76% | 69% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 76% | 74% | 70% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 72% | 72% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 75% | 73% | 73% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 72% | 71% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 69% | 68% | 71% |
2006 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 44% | 43% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 49% | 47% | 46% |
2008 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 54% | 53% | 47% |
2009 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 50% | 48% | 49% |
2010 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 56% | 56% | 53% |
2011 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 50% | 49% | 51% |
2012 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 55% | 53% | 51% |
2013 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 55% | 54% | 52% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 81% | 74% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 80% | 79% | 75% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 81% | 79% | 75% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 85% | 78% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 78% | 77% | 78% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 79% | 77% | 79% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 81% | 81% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 77% | 76% | 78% |
2003 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 39.2% | 38.5% | 37% |
2004 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 33% | 33% | 39% |
2005 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 37% | 36% | 39% |
2006 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 42% | 40% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 48% | 47% | 45% |
2008 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 50% | 47% | 49% |
2009 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 59% | 58% | 48% |
2010 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 46% | 43% | 51% |
2011 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 51% | 49% | 52% |
2012 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 53% | 53% | 52% |
2013 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 54% | 52% | 54% |
2003 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 41.5% | 40.6% | 32% |
2004 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 39% | 37% | 33% |
2005 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 33% | 32% | 33% |
2006 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 46% | 45% | 32% |
2007 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 37% | 35% | 33% |
2008 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 44% | 43% | 39% |
2009 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 41% | 40% | 39% |
2010 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 37% | 36% | 40% |
2011 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 34% | 33% | 39% |
2012 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 38% | 37% | 43% |
2013 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 33% | 31% | 39% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Agawam Junior High Middle School was rated 3 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.