A total of 29 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Family Household Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 86.16% | Morgan, UT / 9,485 |
2. | 85.67% | Juab, UT / 10,233 |
3. | 83.05% | Rich, UT / 2,264 |
4. | 81.87% | Box Elder, UT / 49,660 |
5. | 81.71% | Utah, UT / 516,571 |
6. | 80.84% | Davis, UT / 306,664 |
7. | 80.53% | Wasatch, UT / 23,661 |
8. | 80.50% | Duchesne, UT / 18,537 |
9. | 79.02% | Tooele, UT / 58,158 |
10. | 77.81% | Wayne, UT / 2,756 |
11. | 76.62% | Washington, UT / 139,484 |
12. | 76.33% | Sanpete, UT / 27,645 |
13. | 76.31% | Emery, UT / 10,902 |
13. | 76.31% | Millard, UT / 12,436 |
15. | 75.02% | Beaver, UT / 6,527 |
16. | 74.96% | Cache, UT / 112,095 |
17. | 74.81% | Uintah, UT / 32,809 |
18. | 74.18% | Summit, UT / 36,598 |
19. | 74.17% | Sevier, UT / 20,759 |
20. | 74.01% | Piute, UT / 1,699 |
21. | 73.03% | San Juan, UT / 14,707 |
22. | 72.88% | Iron, UT / 45,984 |
23. | 72.70% | Weber, UT / 230,940 |
24. | 70.48% | Garfield, UT / 5,107 |
25. | 70.30% | Salt Lake, UT / 1,032,226 |
26. | 69.14% | Carbon, UT / 21,153 |
27. | 62.39% | Daggett, UT / 897 |
28. | 61.78% | Kane, UT / 7,093 |
29. | 59.38% | Grand, UT / 9,183 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Family Household Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Family Household Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.