Local Data Search
A total of 95 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Percentage of Houses with a Value of $150K - $200K ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 25.9% | Rutherford, TN / 240,181 |
| 2. | 24.6% | Wilson, TN / 106,472 |
| 3. | 23.5% | Cheatham, TN / 39,042 |
| 4. | 22.6% | Robertson, TN / 63,521 |
| 5. | 21.8% | Tipton, TN / 57,543 |
| 6. | 21.6% | Sumner, TN / 151,874 |
| 7. | 20.6% | Sevier, TN / 83,448 |
| 8. | 20.5% | Blount, TN / 119,489 |
| 9. | 20.4% | Davidson, TN / 621,465 |
| 10. | 20.1% | Unicoi, TN / 17,686 |
| 11. | 19.3% | Hamilton, TN / 330,941 |
| 12. | 19.1% | Knox, TN / 423,655 |
| 13. | 18.2% | Dickson, TN / 47,140 |
| 14. | 18.0% | Putnam, TN / 69,938 |
| 15. | 17.5% | Maury, TN / 80,190 |
| 16. | 16.9% | Washington, TN / 116,750 |
| 17. | 16.8% | Bradley, TN / 95,184 |
| 18. | 16.6% | Montgomery, TN / 153,491 |
| 19. | 15.9% | Roane, TN / 53,186 |
| 20. | 15.6% | Fayette, TN / 36,820 |
| 21. | 15.6% | Hamblen, TN / 61,698 |
| 22. | 15.4% | Stewart, TN / 13,078 |
| 23. | 15.1% | Coffee, TN / 51,694 |
| 24. | 15.0% | Shelby, TN / 918,186 |
| 25. | 14.8% | Cannon, TN / 13,505 |
| 26. | 14.2% | Cumberland, TN / 52,852 |
| 27. | 14.0% | Trousdale, TN / 7,682 |
| 28. | 13.7% | Chester, TN / 16,106 |
| 29. | 13.7% | Lewis, TN / 11,466 |
| 30. | 13.6% | Smith, TN / 18,863 |
| 31. | 13.5% | Anderson, TN / 73,382 |
| 32. | 13.3% | Loudon, TN / 45,176 |
| 33. | 13.3% | Monroe, TN / 44,602 |
| 34. | 13.2% | Sullivan, TN / 153,314 |
| 35. | 13.1% | Moore, TN / 6,044 |
| 36. | 13.1% | Lincoln, TN / 32,764 |
| 37. | 13.0% | Madison, TN / 96,346 |
| 38. | 12.8% | Fentress, TN / 17,412 |
| 39. | 12.8% | Franklin, TN / 41,021 |
| 40. | 12.8% | Jefferson, TN / 50,116 |
| 41. | 12.8% | Polk, TN / 15,735 |
| 42. | 12.7% | Mcminn, TN / 52,055 |
| 43. | 12.5% | Mcnairy, TN / 25,436 |
| 44. | 12.4% | Greene, TN / 65,698 |
| 45. | 12.3% | Pickett, TN / 4,803 |
| 46. | 12.0% | Giles, TN / 29,075 |
| 47. | 11.7% | Meigs, TN / 11,747 |
| 48. | 11.7% | Rhea, TN / 30,633 |
| 49. | 11.6% | Williamson, TN / 165,526 |
| 50. | 11.6% | Marion, TN / 27,960 |
| 51. | 11.6% | Gibson, TN / 48,586 |
| 52. | 11.5% | Macon, TN / 21,708 |
| 53. | 11.2% | Haywood, TN / 19,155 |
| 54. | 11.2% | Marshall, TN / 29,297 |
| 55. | 11.1% | Bedford, TN / 44,291 |
| 56. | 11.1% | Hawkins, TN / 56,957 |
| 57. | 11.1% | Hickman, TN / 23,670 |
| 58. | 10.8% | Dekalb, TN / 18,624 |
| 59. | 10.7% | Decatur, TN / 11,472 |
| 60. | 10.4% | Hardeman, TN / 27,759 |
| 61. | 10.4% | Carter, TN / 58,955 |
| 62. | 10.4% | Cocke, TN / 35,406 |
| 63. | 10.2% | Warren, TN / 39,915 |
| 64. | 10.2% | Henderson, TN / 26,687 |
| 65. | 10.0% | Lawrence, TN / 40,899 |
| 66. | 10.0% | Overton, TN / 20,816 |
| 67. | 10.0% | Obion, TN / 31,610 |
| 67. | 10.0% | Campbell, TN / 40,646 |
| 69. | 9.9% | Hardin, TN / 26,093 |
| 70. | 9.8% | Dyer, TN / 37,698 |
| 71. | 9.8% | Grainger, TN / 22,549 |
| 72. | 9.8% | Crockett, TN / 14,408 |
| 73. | 9.7% | Lauderdale, TN / 26,568 |
| 74. | 9.5% | Perry, TN / 7,694 |
| 75. | 9.5% | Bledsoe, TN / 12,941 |
| 76. | 9.4% | Claiborne, TN / 31,081 |
| 77. | 9.2% | Weakley, TN / 33,389 |
| 78. | 8.9% | Scott, TN / 21,852 |
| 79. | 8.9% | White, TN / 24,897 |
| 80. | 8.9% | Union, TN / 18,927 |
| 81. | 8.8% | Humphreys, TN / 18,151 |
| 82. | 8.7% | Henry, TN / 31,567 |
| 83. | 8.6% | Johnson, TN / 18,019 |
| 84. | 8.5% | Jackson, TN / 10,896 |
| 85. | 8.4% | Wayne, TN / 16,592 |
| 86. | 8.3% | Benton, TN / 16,130 |
| 87. | 8.3% | Hancock, TN / 6,633 |
| 88. | 8.3% | Grundy, TN / 14,262 |
| 89. | 7.7% | Carroll, TN / 28,686 |
| 90. | 7.2% | Houston, TN / 8,041 |
| 91. | 7.2% | Sequatchie, TN / 13,377 |
| 92. | 6.7% | Clay, TN / 7,937 |
| 93. | 6.3% | Van Buren, TN / 5,423 |
| 94. | 5.8% | Morgan, TN / 19,294 |
| 95. | 4.9% | Lake, TN / 7,404 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Percentage of Houses with a Value of $150K - $200K' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Percentage of Houses with a Value of $150K - $200K' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.