Prospect School District 59
Prospect School District 59 is located in southwest Oregon. Prospect School District 59 has 249.75 square miles of land area and 3.92 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Prospect School District 59 population is 1,044. Prospect School District 59 median household income is $43,167 in 2010-2014. Prospect School District 59 median house value is $175,600 in 2010-2014. On average, Prospect School District 59 is much better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Prospect School District 59 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
160 Mill Creek Dr
Prospect OR, 97536, Jackson County
Phone: 541-560-3653
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 221 | 253 | 254 | 225 | 201 | 168 | 156 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | NA | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 16.99 | 18.00 | 17.50 | 17.50 | 15.50 | 13.60 | 12.70 |
Prekindergarten: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | 1.23 | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.23 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Elementary: | 10.27 | 10.89 | 10.39 | 10.39 | 8.78 | 7.50 | 6.60 |
Secondary: | 5.49 | 5.80 | 5.80 | 5.80 | 5.49 | 5.60 | 5.60 |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Total Other Staff: | 20.00 | 20.26 | 22.63 | 18.27 | 16.75 | 13.40 | 13.60 |
Instructional Aides: | 8.00 | 9.08 | 8.00 | 6.81 | 8.00 | 5.20 | 5.50 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.80 |
District Administrators: | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
District Administrative Support: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 2.00 | 3.00 |
School Administrators: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | 2.00 | 2.01 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | 4.25 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Other Support Services: | 1.75 | 2.52 | 8.13 | 4.46 | 2.75 | 3.00 | 2.80 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 13.01 | 14.06 | 14.51 | 12.86 | 12.97 | 12.35 | 12.28 |
Schools
Prospect Charter School | Kindergarten to Grade 12 | 160 Mill Creek Dr, Prospect OR 97536 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
OAKS Test | |||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 26.1% | 43.2% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 36.8% | 46.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 15.8% | 45% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 26.9% | 55% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 40% | 52% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 54% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 29.2% | 53.6% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 50% | 68% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 40% | 66% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 36.8% | 69% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 43.5% | 50.5% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 36.8% | 53.5% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 31.6% | 55% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 40% | 66% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 50% | 65% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 66% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 66.1% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 83% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 84% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 85% |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 56.5% | 59.1% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 47.4% | 60.5% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 31.6% | 62% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 53.3% | 57% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 41.2% | 58% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 50% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 47.1% | 70% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 34.6% | 64% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 16.7% | 63% |
2004 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 37.5% | 48% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 21.1% | 54.4% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 42.9% | 55% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 36.8% | 55% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | N/A |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 42.9% | 55% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 26.1% | 53.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 47.1% | 68% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.1% | 67% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 60% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 36.4% | 81.9% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 86.1% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 86% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 70% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 55.6% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 18.2% | 76.5% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 23.5% | 63% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 35.3% | 64% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 38.5% | 61% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 83% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 85.5% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75% | 87% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 83% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 84% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 83% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 36.4% | 82.8% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 83% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 29.4% | 70% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 66% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 88% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 64.3% | 72% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 77.2% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 18.8% | 65% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 26.7% | 66% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 64% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 87% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 83% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 84% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 85% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 40% | 74% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 40.0% | 73% |
2005 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 15.4% | 32.4% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 42% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 38.5% | 45% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 43% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 28.6% | 78.9% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 84% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 60% | 85% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 68% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 50% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 76.5% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 60% | 58% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 16.7% | 60% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 28.6% | 58% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 76.8% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 81.4% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 83% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 72% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 75% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 76% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 50% | 76.3% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 70% | 78% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 22.2% | 69% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 64.3% | 68% |
2004 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 69.9% |
2005 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 50% | 75% |
2006 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 79% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 75% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 75% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 74.4% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 70% | 74% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 37.5% | 69% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 41.7% | 67% |
2004 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 7.7% | 33.2% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 52.9% | 77% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 38.5% | 70% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 73% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 72.8% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 37.5% | 59% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 40% | 59% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 13.0% | 59% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 80% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 75% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 73% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 75% | 76.5% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 79% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 53.3% | 65% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 34.8% | 63% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 25% | 71% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 74% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 74% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 53.8% | 78% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 77.8% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 14.3% | 61% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 52.6% | 63% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 38.9% | 61% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 54.5% | 73% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 77% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 74% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 77.3% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 40.9% | 80% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 50% | 75% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 73% |
2005 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 7.1% | 39.4% |
2006 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | < 5.0% | 45% |
2007 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 43.8% | 48% |
2008 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 37.5% | 50% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 23.5% | 59.8% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 52.4% | 63.5% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 52.9% | 66% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 38.5% | 70% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 50% | 69% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 71% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 52.9% | 70.6% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 31.3% | 65% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 14.3% | 65% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 52.6% | 63% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 35.3% | 60% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 62.5% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 52.9% | 66% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 46.2% | 69% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 60% | 65% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 70% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 69.5% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 50% | 72% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 19% | 68% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 40.0% | 67% |
2004 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 35.3% | 59% |
2005 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 42.9% | 65.8% |
2006 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 41.2% | 68% |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 50% | 69% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 72% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 47.1% | 70.8% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 53.3% | 71% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 30% | 66% |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 42.1% | 66% |
2004 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 11.8% | 37.2% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $5,244,000 | $20,646 | $2,795,000 | $12,422 | $4,035,000 | $20,075 | |||
Federal: | $165,000 | $650 | 3.1% | $415,000 | $1,844 | 14.8% | $332,000 | $1,652 | 8.2% |
State: | $4,429,000 | $17,437 | 84.5% | $1,803,000 | $8,013 | 64.5% | $3,203,000 | $15,935 | 79.4% |
Local: | $650,000 | $2,559 | 12.4% | $577,000 | $2,564 | 20.6% | $500,000 | $2,488 | 12.4% |
Total Expenditures: | $5,432,000 | $21,386 | $3,192,000 | $14,187 | $4,418,000 | $21,980 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $4,544,000 | $17,890 | $3,161,000 | $14,049 | $3,951,000 | $19,657 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $3,144,000 | $12,378 | 69.2% | $1,732,000 | $7,698 | 54.8% | $2,694,000 | $13,403 | 68.2% |
Student and Staff Support: | $82,000 | $323 | 1.8% | $171,000 | $760 | 5.4% | $123,000 | $612 | 3.1% |
Administration: | $568,000 | $2,236 | 12.5% | $554,000 | $2,462 | 17.5% | $499,000 | $2,483 | 12.6% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $750,000 | $2,953 | 16.5% | $704,000 | $3,129 | 22.3% | $635,000 | $3,159 | 16.1% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $0 | $0 | $29,000 | $129 | $70,000 | $348 | |||
Construction: | $0 | $0 | $29,000 | $129 | $46,000 | $229 | |||
Total Other: | $1,000 | $4 | $2,000 | $9 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1,000 | $5 | |||
Total Salary: | $2,664,000 | $10,488 | $1,346,000 | $5,982 | $2,428,000 | $12,080 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $2,423,000 | $9,539 | 91.0% | $981,000 | $4,360 | 72.9% | $2,093,000 | $10,413 | 86.2% |
Other Salary: | $241,000 | $949 | 9.0% | $365,000 | $1,622 | 27.1% | $335,000 | $1,667 | 13.8% |
Total Benefit: | $664,000 | $2,614 | $763,000 | $3,391 | $541,000 | $2,692 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $469,000 | $1,846 | 70.6% | $543,000 | $2,413 | 71.2% | $380,000 | $1,891 | 70.2% |
Other Benefit: | $195,000 | $768 | 29.4% | $220,000 | $978 | 28.8% | $161,000 | $801 | 29.8% |
* Prospect School District 59 was rated 1 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.