Lisle Community Unit School District 202
Lisle Community Unit School District 202 is located in northeast Illinois. Lisle Community Unit School District 202 has 5.66 square miles of land area and 0.11 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Lisle Community Unit School District 202 population is 13,791. Lisle Community Unit School District 202 median household income is $64,455 in 2010-2014. Lisle Community Unit School District 202 median house value is $269,000 in 2010-2014. On average, Lisle Community Unit School District 202 is much better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Lisle Community Unit School District 202 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 1,563 | 1,615 | 1,618 | 1,637 | 1,589 | 1,595 | 1,571 |
English Language Learner Students: | 63 | 67 | 55 | 51 | 49 | 53 | 21 |
Total Teachers: | 121.07 | NA | 107.79 | 108.97 | 113.49 | 111.30 | 97.90 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 1.11 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 3.00 | 2.02 | 3.00 | 2.50 | 3.00 |
Elementary: | 72.77 | NA | 66.84 | 67.86 | 65.77 | 69.40 | 33.80 |
Secondary: | 45.30 | NA | 36.95 | 37.98 | 42.72 | 37.40 | 61.10 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 45.50 | 120.11 | 29.33 | 32.03 | 30.00 | 34.80 | 46.70 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 50.65 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 1.24 | 1.00 | 4.50 | 2.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 4.00 | NA | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 6.00 | 2.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 4.00 | NA | 3.00 | 4.36 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 2.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 3.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 3.00 |
School Administrators: | 8.00 | NA | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 7.30 | 4.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 16.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 12.33 | 13.43 | 12.00 | 12.00 | 13.70 |
Other Support Services: | 20.50 | 45.46 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 15.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 12.91 | NA | 15.01 | 15.02 | 14.00 | 14.33 | 16.05 |
Schools
Lisle High School | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 1800 Short St, Lisle IL 60532 | |
Lisle Jr High School | Grade 6 to Grade 8 | 5207 Center Ave, Lisle IL 60532 | |
Schiesher Elementary School | Grade 3 to Grade 5 | 5205 Kingston Ave, Lisle IL 60532 | |
Tate Woods Elementary School | Grade 1 to Grade 2 | 1736 Middleton Ave, Lisle IL 60532 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.0% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 98.1% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.0% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.3% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.0% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.9% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 77.0% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.0% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.0% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.0% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.0% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.2% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.8% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 90% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 68.9% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 74.8% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.7% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 46.9% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.3% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 83% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.3% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.5% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 74.4% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.0% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.5% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 94.0% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 82% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 64.5% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.0% | 54.4% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.9% | 67.1% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.8% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.8% | 59.8% |
PSAE Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 67.3% | 53.3% |
2004 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 70.2% | 53.1% |
2005 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 63.8% | 52.8% |
2006 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 57.9% | 53.7% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 59.2% | 52.7% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.8% | 53.0% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.3% | 51.6% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 65.5% | 52.7% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 70.0% | 51.3% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 69.8% | 51.6% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 66.1% | 51.8% |
2003 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 56.4% |
2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 70.2% | 56.8% |
2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 59.5% |
2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 66.2% | 58.4% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 65.6% | 54.0% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 62.0% | 53.3% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 67.4% | 56.9% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 61.3% | 54.0% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 68.6% | 51.1% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 65.1% | 50.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 54.8% |
2003 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 64% | 51.3% |
2004 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 68.0% | 52.9% |
2005 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 68.5% | 52.5% |
2006 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 68.1% | 50.8% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 63.7% | 51.0% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.1% | 51.2% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 50.5% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 71.8% | 52.4% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 73.2% | 49.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 51.7% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 73.6% | 49.4% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $33,905,000 | $20,955 | $33,620,000 | $20,538 | $33,374,000 | $21,003 | |||
Federal: | $1,245,000 | $769 | 3.7% | $1,165,000 | $712 | 3.5% | $1,237,000 | $778 | 3.7% |
State: | $5,252,000 | $3,246 | 15.5% | $5,174,000 | $3,161 | 15.4% | $4,738,000 | $2,982 | 14.2% |
Local: | $27,408,000 | $16,939 | 80.8% | $27,281,000 | $16,665 | 81.1% | $27,399,000 | $17,243 | 82.1% |
Total Expenditures: | $30,220,000 | $18,677 | $28,965,000 | $17,694 | $28,149,000 | $17,715 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $26,397,000 | $16,315 | $25,897,000 | $15,820 | $25,445,000 | $16,013 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $15,087,000 | $9,324 | 57.2% | $14,397,000 | $8,795 | 55.6% | $14,215,000 | $8,946 | 55.9% |
Student and Staff Support: | $3,146,000 | $1,944 | 11.9% | $3,100,000 | $1,894 | 12.0% | $3,288,000 | $2,069 | 12.9% |
Administration: | $4,068,000 | $2,514 | 15.4% | $4,169,000 | $2,547 | 16.1% | $3,934,000 | $2,476 | 15.5% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $4,096,000 | $2,532 | 15.5% | $4,231,000 | $2,585 | 16.3% | $4,008,000 | $2,522 | 15.8% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $1,271,000 | $786 | $490,000 | $299 | $566,000 | $356 | |||
Construction: | $898,000 | $555 | $135,000 | $82 | $49,000 | $31 | |||
Total Other: | $100,000 | $62 | $104,000 | $64 | $67,000 | $42 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $367,000 | $227 | $480,000 | $293 | $581,000 | $366 | |||
Total Salary: | $14,047,000 | $8,682 | $13,634,000 | $8,329 | $14,094,000 | $8,870 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $9,331,000 | $5,767 | 66.4% | $9,051,000 | $5,529 | 66.4% | $9,406,000 | $5,919 | 66.7% |
Other Salary: | $4,716,000 | $2,915 | 33.6% | $4,583,000 | $2,800 | 33.6% | $4,688,000 | $2,950 | 33.3% |
Total Benefit: | $7,855,000 | $4,855 | $7,457,000 | $4,555 | $7,203,000 | $4,533 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $4,920,000 | $3,041 | 62.6% | $4,504,000 | $2,751 | 60.4% | $4,467,000 | $2,811 | 62.0% |
Other Benefit: | $2,935,000 | $1,814 | 37.4% | $2,953,000 | $1,804 | 39.6% | $2,736,000 | $1,722 | 38.0% |
* Lisle Community Unit School District 202 was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.