A total of 100 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Occupied House with 3 or More Vehicles ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 40.4% | Camden, NC / 9,375 |
2. | 36.2% | Currituck, NC / 23,713 |
3. | 36.1% | Stokes, NC / 45,916 |
4. | 34.8% | Davie, NC / 40,297 |
5. | 34.1% | Gates, NC / 11,555 |
6. | 33.9% | Person, NC / 37,301 |
7. | 33.9% | Madison, NC / 20,227 |
8. | 33.0% | Caswell, NC / 23,228 |
9. | 32.8% | Greene, NC / 20,402 |
10. | 32.6% | Yadkin, NC / 37,520 |
11. | 32.5% | Alexander, NC / 36,278 |
12. | 32.2% | Stanly, NC / 59,136 |
13. | 31.0% | Hoke, NC / 42,410 |
14. | 30.7% | Franklin, NC / 57,201 |
15. | 30.5% | Lincoln, NC / 72,728 |
16. | 30.0% | Randolph, NC / 139,443 |
17. | 30.0% | Granville, NC / 55,670 |
17. | 30.0% | Chatham, NC / 61,444 |
19. | 29.9% | Union, NC / 181,852 |
20. | 29.9% | Iredell, NC / 150,346 |
21. | 29.9% | Yancey, NC / 18,336 |
22. | 29.8% | Ashe, NC / 25,467 |
23. | 29.8% | Rockingham, NC / 92,007 |
24. | 29.4% | Swain, NC / 13,367 |
25. | 29.2% | Wilkes, NC / 66,563 |
26. | 29.1% | Caldwell, NC / 79,382 |
27. | 28.7% | Anson, NC / 25,243 |
27. | 28.7% | Sampson, NC / 62,996 |
29. | 28.7% | Davidson, NC / 156,033 |
30. | 28.6% | Polk, NC / 19,107 |
31. | 28.3% | Northampton, NC / 20,611 |
32. | 28.3% | Montgomery, NC / 27,456 |
33. | 28.2% | Burke, NC / 88,987 |
34. | 28.1% | Surry, NC / 72,166 |
35. | 27.4% | Perquimans, NC / 12,367 |
36. | 27.3% | Rowan, NC / 137,387 |
37. | 27.1% | Catawba, NC / 155,157 |
38. | 26.9% | Johnston, NC / 156,888 |
39. | 26.6% | Duplin, NC / 52,358 |
40. | 26.3% | Pender, NC / 49,408 |
41. | 26.3% | Pamlico, NC / 12,470 |
42. | 26.2% | Beaufort, NC / 45,993 |
43. | 25.8% | Harnett, NC / 108,885 |
44. | 25.8% | Alamance, NC / 144,769 |
45. | 25.6% | Cherokee, NC / 26,203 |
46. | 25.4% | Mitchell, NC / 15,690 |
47. | 25.3% | Cabarrus, NC / 161,473 |
48. | 25.2% | Mcdowell, NC / 43,587 |
49. | 25.1% | Macon, NC / 32,607 |
50. | 24.9% | Haywood, NC / 56,535 |
51. | 24.9% | Cleveland, NC / 98,331 |
52. | 24.7% | Columbus, NC / 54,050 |
53. | 24.6% | Nash, NC / 92,814 |
54. | 24.5% | Clay, NC / 10,084 |
55. | 24.5% | Jones, NC / 10,028 |
56. | 24.4% | Lee, NC / 57,919 |
57. | 24.2% | Rutherford, NC / 63,153 |
58. | 23.8% | Bladen, NC / 32,412 |
59. | 23.7% | Bertie, NC / 19,187 |
60. | 23.6% | Wayne, NC / 113,290 |
61. | 23.6% | Hertford, NC / 23,281 |
62. | 23.6% | Jackson, NC / 36,447 |
63. | 23.4% | Halifax, NC / 55,118 |
64. | 23.1% | Dare, NC / 33,976 |
65. | 23.1% | Gaston, NC / 202,149 |
66. | 22.7% | Graham, NC / 7,964 |
67. | 22.7% | Moore, NC / 84,280 |
68. | 22.7% | Vance, NC / 42,987 |
69. | 22.6% | Avery, NC / 17,903 |
70. | 22.6% | Hyde, NC / 5,256 |
71. | 22.5% | Henderson, NC / 100,333 |
72. | 22.5% | Orange, NC / 124,503 |
72. | 22.5% | Edgecombe, NC / 52,586 |
74. | 22.4% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,112 |
75. | 22.3% | Robeson, NC / 127,686 |
76. | 22.2% | Chowan, NC / 14,629 |
77. | 21.7% | Alleghany, NC / 10,905 |
78. | 21.6% | Scotland, NC / 36,394 |
79. | 21.6% | Buncombe, NC / 225,869 |
80. | 21.5% | Warren, NC / 19,545 |
81. | 21.5% | Watauga, NC / 44,636 |
82. | 21.4% | Transylvania, NC / 29,886 |
83. | 21.0% | Richmond, NC / 45,947 |
84. | 21.0% | Wilson, NC / 76,765 |
85. | 21.0% | Brunswick, NC / 98,712 |
86. | 21.0% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,334 |
87. | 20.9% | Martin, NC / 23,699 |
88. | 20.8% | Onslow, NC / 165,181 |
89. | 20.7% | Forsyth, NC / 346,851 |
90. | 20.4% | Lenoir, NC / 56,831 |
91. | 20.4% | Washington, NC / 12,979 |
92. | 20.4% | Cumberland, NC / 309,316 |
93. | 20.3% | Carteret, NC / 63,369 |
94. | 20.3% | Pitt, NC / 151,931 |
95. | 19.7% | Guilford, NC / 464,041 |
96. | 19.4% | Craven, NC / 96,789 |
97. | 19.0% | Wake, NC / 828,759 |
98. | 18.4% | New Hanover, NC / 189,463 |
99. | 16.0% | Durham, NC / 256,296 |
100. | 16.0% | Mecklenburg, NC / 861,189 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Occupied House with 3 or More Vehicles' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Occupied House with 3 or More Vehicles' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.