Local Data Search
A total of 92 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Management, Professional, and Related Occupations Female Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 51.9% | Hamilton, IN / 276,098 |
| 2. | 48.9% | Boone, IN / 56,823 |
| 3. | 44.0% | Hendricks, IN / 145,880 |
| 4. | 43.8% | Monroe, IN / 138,048 |
| 5. | 42.0% | Hancock, IN / 69,778 |
| 6. | 41.2% | Tippecanoe, IN / 173,317 |
| 7. | 40.4% | Bartholomew, IN / 77,297 |
| 8. | 39.6% | Union, IN / 7,449 |
| 9. | 38.5% | Porter, IN / 164,386 |
| 10. | 38.4% | Johnson, IN / 140,033 |
| 11. | 38.4% | Allen, IN / 355,940 |
| 12. | 37.2% | Pulaski, IN / 13,395 |
| 13. | 37.2% | Marion, IN / 904,535 |
| 14. | 37.1% | Warrick, IN / 59,643 |
| 15. | 36.9% | Franklin, IN / 23,108 |
| 16. | 36.7% | Vigo, IN / 107,805 |
| 17. | 36.6% | Brown, IN / 15,181 |
| 18. | 36.4% | Wayne, IN / 68,797 |
| 19. | 36.1% | Jasper, IN / 33,369 |
| 20. | 36.0% | Sullivan, IN / 21,379 |
| 21. | 35.9% | St Joseph, IN / 266,785 |
| 22. | 35.6% | Fulton, IN / 20,762 |
| 23. | 35.5% | Lake, IN / 495,230 |
| 24. | 35.5% | Morgan, IN / 69,033 |
| 25. | 35.1% | Fountain, IN / 17,212 |
| 26. | 35.0% | Rush, IN / 17,349 |
| 27. | 34.8% | Shelby, IN / 44,435 |
| 28. | 34.5% | Clark, IN / 110,100 |
| 29. | 34.3% | Martin, IN / 10,300 |
| 30. | 34.0% | Jennings, IN / 28,373 |
| 31. | 33.9% | Putnam, IN / 37,995 |
| 32. | 33.9% | Madison, IN / 131,244 |
| 33. | 33.8% | Randolph, IN / 26,101 |
| 34. | 33.6% | Vanderburgh, IN / 179,610 |
| 35. | 33.5% | Tipton, IN / 15,917 |
| 36. | 33.5% | Grant, IN / 69,886 |
| 37. | 33.5% | Spencer, IN / 20,948 |
| 37. | 33.5% | Dearborn, IN / 49,904 |
| 39. | 33.4% | Floyd, IN / 74,601 |
| 40. | 33.3% | Carroll, IN / 20,105 |
| 41. | 33.2% | Harrison, IN / 39,102 |
| 42. | 33.1% | Parke, IN / 17,251 |
| 43. | 32.9% | Fayette, IN / 24,220 |
| 44. | 32.9% | De Kalb, IN / 42,218 |
| 45. | 32.8% | Clay, IN / 26,908 |
| 46. | 32.7% | Greene, IN / 33,032 |
| 47. | 32.7% | Delaware, IN / 117,459 |
| 48. | 32.5% | Jay, IN / 21,353 |
| 49. | 32.2% | Benton, IN / 8,816 |
| 50. | 32.1% | Wabash, IN / 32,804 |
| 51. | 32.1% | Howard, IN / 82,914 |
| 52. | 31.9% | Lawrence, IN / 46,131 |
| 53. | 31.8% | Daviess, IN / 31,604 |
| 54. | 31.7% | Posey, IN / 25,840 |
| 55. | 31.6% | Henry, IN / 49,381 |
| 56. | 31.5% | Cass, IN / 38,875 |
| 57. | 31.3% | Miami, IN / 36,850 |
| 58. | 31.3% | Washington, IN / 28,162 |
| 59. | 31.1% | La Porte, IN / 111,335 |
| 60. | 31.1% | Steuben, IN / 34,116 |
| 61. | 30.8% | Ripley, IN / 28,702 |
| 62. | 30.8% | Adams, IN / 34,343 |
| 63. | 30.7% | Montgomery, IN / 38,207 |
| 64. | 30.5% | Warren, IN / 8,490 |
| 65. | 30.3% | Marshall, IN / 47,045 |
| 66. | 30.2% | Dubois, IN / 41,995 |
| 67. | 30.1% | Owen, IN / 21,583 |
| 68. | 30.1% | Kosciusko, IN / 77,328 |
| 69. | 29.9% | Wells, IN / 27,677 |
| 69. | 29.9% | Knox, IN / 38,392 |
| 71. | 29.8% | Orange, IN / 19,828 |
| 72. | 29.4% | Huntington, IN / 37,144 |
| 73. | 29.0% | White, IN / 24,612 |
| 74. | 28.9% | Jefferson, IN / 32,501 |
| 75. | 28.8% | Decatur, IN / 25,772 |
| 76. | 28.6% | Elkhart, IN / 198,214 |
| 77. | 28.3% | Gibson, IN / 33,437 |
| 78. | 28.3% | Starke, IN / 23,310 |
| 79. | 28.2% | Newton, IN / 14,199 |
| 80. | 28.1% | Whitley, IN / 33,234 |
| 81. | 27.9% | Pike, IN / 12,849 |
| 82. | 27.6% | Jackson, IN / 42,414 |
| 83. | 27.6% | Scott, IN / 24,044 |
| 84. | 27.6% | Clinton, IN / 33,179 |
| 85. | 27.5% | Blackford, IN / 12,742 |
| 86. | 26.9% | Vermillion, IN / 16,224 |
| 87. | 26.9% | Noble, IN / 47,547 |
| 88. | 26.0% | Perry, IN / 19,408 |
| 89. | 25.3% | Crawford, IN / 10,702 |
| 90. | 24.9% | Lagrange, IN / 37,284 |
| 91. | 24.5% | Ohio, IN / 6,093 |
| 92. | 21.9% | Switzerland, IN / 10,509 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Management, Professional, and Related Occupations Female Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Management, Professional, and Related Occupations Female Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.