Local Data Search
A total of 82 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Family in Poverty Percentage ▼ | Zip / Population |
| 1. | 37.5% | 96751 / 209 |
| 2. | 29.0% | 96770 / 630 |
| 3. | 25.2% | 96769 / 638 |
| 4. | 23.2% | 96778 / 10,653 |
| 5. | 19.9% | 96792 / 42,342 |
| 6. | 19.9% | 96771 / 4,410 |
| 7. | 18.8% | 96772 / 1,930 |
| 8. | 18.6% | 96777 / 1,466 |
| 9. | 16.5% | 96749 / 11,553 |
| 10. | 16.5% | 96717 / 5,063 |
| 11. | 16.4% | 96760 / 2,070 |
| 12. | 16.3% | 96728 / 587 |
| 13. | 16.2% | 96748 / 4,692 |
| 14. | 15.9% | 96783 / 1,895 |
| 15. | 15.6% | 96713 / 1,612 |
| 16. | 14.8% | 96764 / 795 |
| 17. | 14.4% | 96814 / 13,906 |
| 18. | 14.2% | 96737 / 2,112 |
| 19. | 13.9% | 96785 / 2,855 |
| 20. | 13.9% | 96703 / 2,174 |
| 21. | 13.7% | 96729 / 1,075 |
| 22. | 12.7% | 96712 / 7,699 |
| 23. | 12.6% | 96819 / 47,299 |
| 24. | 12.6% | 96762 / 4,883 |
| 25. | 11.7% | 96817 / 52,044 |
| 26. | 11.5% | 96746 / 16,188 |
| 27. | 11.3% | 96826 / 31,187 |
| 28. | 11.0% | 96752 / 2,930 |
| 29. | 10.9% | 96813 / 21,435 |
| 30. | 10.9% | 96720 / 42,916 |
| 31. | 10.8% | 96754 / 2,075 |
| 32. | 10.6% | 96731 / 2,716 |
| 33. | 10.5% | 96725 / 2,956 |
| 34. | 10.5% | 96781 / 1,573 |
| 35. | 10.2% | 96750 / 2,629 |
| 35. | 10.2% | 96776 / 1,396 |
| 37. | 10.1% | 96791 / 7,908 |
| 38. | 9.8% | 96708 / 8,595 |
| 39. | 9.8% | 96786 / 41,605 |
| 40. | 9.7% | 96722 / 1,212 |
| 41. | 9.6% | 96755 / 2,973 |
| 42. | 9.6% | 96738 / 5,269 |
| 43. | 9.1% | 96705 / 1,955 |
| 44. | 8.7% | 96747 / 607 |
| 45. | 8.5% | 96763 / 3,189 |
| 46. | 8.4% | 96757 / 858 |
| 47. | 8.4% | 96704 / 6,617 |
| 48. | 8.4% | 96793 / 21,762 |
| 49. | 8.4% | 96756 / 5,312 |
| 50. | 8.3% | 96719 / 2,615 |
| 51. | 8.0% | 96796 / 2,205 |
| 52. | 7.8% | 96732 / 19,390 |
| 53. | 7.7% | 96714 / 2,165 |
| 54. | 7.7% | 96730 / 1,543 |
| 55. | 7.3% | 96815 / 27,507 |
| 56. | 6.9% | 96780 / 524 |
| 57. | 6.8% | 96822 / 43,921 |
| 58. | 6.6% | 96753 / 22,437 |
| 59. | 6.4% | 96795 / 9,872 |
| 60. | 6.3% | 96727 / 4,435 |
| 61. | 6.3% | 96797 / 63,228 |
| 62. | 5.9% | 96768 / 15,877 |
| 63. | 5.7% | 96761 / 18,518 |
| 64. | 5.4% | 96716 / 2,475 |
| 65. | 5.3% | 96790 / 6,690 |
| 65. | 5.3% | 96816 / 48,839 |
| 67. | 5.3% | 96779 / 2,753 |
| 68. | 4.9% | 96740 / 25,132 |
| 69. | 4.8% | 96701 / 41,423 |
| 70. | 4.7% | 96782 / 37,879 |
| 71. | 4.6% | 96710 / 370 |
| 72. | 4.5% | 96706 / 43,874 |
| 73. | 4.1% | 96766 / 12,011 |
| 74. | 4.1% | 96707 / 25,054 |
| 75. | 4.0% | 96818 / 54,856 |
| 76. | 3.8% | 96743 / 8,546 |
| 77. | 3.8% | 96744 / 54,415 |
| 78. | 3.6% | 96734 / 51,081 |
| 79. | 3.0% | 96741 / 6,277 |
| 80. | 2.9% | 96789 / 45,093 |
| 81. | 2.7% | 96825 / 27,657 |
| 82. | 2.0% | 96821 / 18,655 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Family in Poverty Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Family in Poverty Percentage' data are not listed.