Local Data Search
A total of 67 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Occupied Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 92.0% | Autauga, AL / 49,584 |
| 2. | 91.9% | Morgan, AL / 115,197 |
| 3. | 91.2% | Shelby, AL / 182,996 |
| 4. | 90.3% | Madison, AL / 314,047 |
| 5. | 90.1% | Limestone, AL / 74,076 |
| 6. | 89.5% | Lee, AL / 130,669 |
| 7. | 88.4% | Etowah, AL / 103,150 |
| 8. | 88.2% | Elmore, AL / 76,714 |
| 9. | 87.9% | Calhoun, AL / 112,969 |
| 10. | 87.8% | Montgomery, AL / 224,369 |
| 11. | 87.7% | Blount, AL / 56,804 |
| 11. | 87.7% | Franklin, AL / 30,847 |
| 13. | 87.4% | Marion, AL / 29,415 |
| 14. | 87.3% | Lawrence, AL / 34,094 |
| 15. | 87.1% | Mobile, AL / 405,331 |
| 16. | 87.0% | Jefferson, AL / 662,212 |
| 17. | 86.9% | Colbert, AL / 54,546 |
| 18. | 86.6% | Lauderdale, AL / 88,550 |
| 19. | 86.5% | Chilton, AL / 42,272 |
| 20. | 86.4% | Bibb, AL / 21,464 |
| 21. | 86.4% | Coffee, AL / 46,802 |
| 22. | 86.4% | Marshall, AL / 87,925 |
| 23. | 86.4% | Pike, AL / 30,136 |
| 24. | 85.6% | Tuscaloosa, AL / 178,754 |
| 25. | 85.5% | Clay, AL / 13,769 |
| 26. | 85.5% | De Kalb, AL / 68,183 |
| 27. | 85.3% | Houston, AL / 97,091 |
| 28. | 85.1% | Crenshaw, AL / 13,687 |
| 29. | 84.9% | Dale, AL / 48,233 |
| 30. | 84.8% | Saint Clair, AL / 77,585 |
| 31. | 84.7% | Jackson, AL / 52,898 |
| 32. | 84.6% | Talladega, AL / 80,190 |
| 33. | 84.6% | Cullman, AL / 80,630 |
| 34. | 84.4% | Fayette, AL / 17,651 |
| 35. | 83.8% | Russell, AL / 50,029 |
| 36. | 83.7% | Pickens, AL / 19,528 |
| 37. | 83.5% | Escambia, AL / 37,561 |
| 38. | 83.4% | Geneva, AL / 25,800 |
| 39. | 83.1% | Walker, AL / 68,880 |
| 40. | 82.2% | Barbour, AL / 29,663 |
| 41. | 81.8% | Marengo, AL / 21,210 |
| 42. | 81.7% | Cleburne, AL / 14,579 |
| 43. | 81.4% | Dallas, AL / 42,748 |
| 44. | 81.2% | Chambers, AL / 34,704 |
| 45. | 81.0% | Bullock, AL / 10,917 |
| 46. | 80.9% | Monroe, AL / 22,790 |
| 47. | 80.8% | Lowndes, AL / 12,632 |
| 48. | 80.7% | Perry, AL / 10,689 |
| 49. | 79.6% | Lamar, AL / 14,438 |
| 50. | 78.7% | Washington, AL / 17,212 |
| 51. | 77.5% | Butler, AL / 20,189 |
| 52. | 76.6% | Covington, AL / 36,688 |
| 53. | 75.8% | Hale, AL / 17,994 |
| 54. | 75.3% | Henry, AL / 16,580 |
| 55. | 75.2% | Tallapoosa, AL / 40,778 |
| 56. | 75.1% | Macon, AL / 22,304 |
| 57. | 74.3% | Sumter, AL / 13,267 |
| 58. | 73.8% | Randolph, AL / 22,504 |
| 59. | 72.6% | Winston, AL / 24,190 |
| 60. | 72.1% | Conecuh, AL / 13,114 |
| 61. | 71.3% | Choctaw, AL / 14,229 |
| 62. | 71.2% | Coosa, AL / 10,777 |
| 63. | 70.8% | Clarke, AL / 26,438 |
| 64. | 69.9% | Cherokee, AL / 24,427 |
| 65. | 69.8% | Greene, AL / 9,112 |
| 66. | 68.7% | Baldwin, AL / 171,997 |
| 67. | 67.8% | Wilcox, AL / 12,552 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.