Bismarck Metro Area Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Bismarck Area | North Dakota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 52,653, see rank, 100% | 332,010 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 49,468, 93.95%, see rank | 88.13% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 35,482, 67.39%, see rank | 57.41% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 13,986, 26.56%, see rank | 30.72% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 3,185, 6.05%, see rank | 11.87% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 377, 0.72%, see rank | 1.87% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 528, 1.00%, see rank | 0.78% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 309, 0.59%, see rank | 0.84% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 1,069, 2.03%, see rank | 4.12% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 11, 0.02%, see rank | 0.27% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 891, 1.69%, see rank | 3.98% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Bismarck Area | North Dakota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 47,833, see rank, 100% | 317,498 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 45,265, 94.63%, see rank | 88.56% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 31,930, 66.75%, see rank | 57.94% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 13,335, 27.88%, see rank | 30.63% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 2,568, 5.37%, see rank | 11.44% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 633, 1.32%, see rank | 2.34% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 448, 0.94%, see rank | 0.86% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 175, 0.37%, see rank | 0.50% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 370, 0.77%, see rank | 3.62% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 4, 0.01%, see rank | 0.10% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 938, 1.96%, see rank | 4.02% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Bismarck Area | North Dakota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 48,068, see rank, 100% | 319,468 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 45,079, 93.78%, see rank | 88.48% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 33,011, 68.68%, see rank | 58.71% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 12,068, 25.11%, see rank | 29.77% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 2,989, 6.22%, see rank | 11.52% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 617, 1.28%, see rank | 1.88% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 462, 0.96%, see rank | 0.84% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 314, 0.65%, see rank | 1.10% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 1,102, 2.29%, see rank | 4.09% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.14% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 494, 1.03%, see rank | 3.47% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Bismarck Area | North Dakota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 46,386, see rank, 100% | 312,861 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 43,725, 94.26%, see rank | 88.42% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 31,688, 68.31%, see rank | 58.85% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 12,037, 25.95%, see rank | 29.57% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 2,661, 5.74%, see rank | 11.58% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 591, 1.27%, see rank | 2.08% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 315, 0.68%, see rank | 0.84% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 419, 0.90%, see rank | 1.49% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 799, 1.72%, see rank | 3.94% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.10% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 537, 1.16%, see rank | 3.13% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Bismarck Area | North Dakota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 44,870, see rank, 100% | 309,043 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 42,295, 94.26%, see rank | 88.35% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 30,530, 68.04%, see rank | 58.02% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 11,765, 26.22%, see rank | 30.32% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 2,575, 5.74%, see rank | 11.65% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 709, 1.58%, see rank | 2.15% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 143, 0.32%, see rank | 0.80% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 377, 0.84%, see rank | 1.54% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 801, 1.79%, see rank | 3.94% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.05% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 545, 1.21%, see rank | 3.18% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
